![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/1ff4618d-d269-4bc6-9431-91fe8f135d20.png)
![](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/a18b0c69-23c9-4b2a-b8e0-3aca0172390d.png)
I mean, if you treat your inbox as a to-do list, that’s not that far-fetched
I mean, if you treat your inbox as a to-do list, that’s not that far-fetched
Wow you’re insane. “I know, I’ll discredit the woman who just pointed out that it’s hard to her credit in my field as a woman ”
Weird how he’s helping the far right in both cases.
Did you get lost?
Python is just glorified shell scripting
Absolutely not, python is an actual programming language with sane error handling and arbitrarily nestable data structures.
I don’t like the indentation crap
Don’t be so superficial. When learning something, go with the flow and try to work with the design choices, not against them.
Python simply writes a bit differently: you do e.g. more function definitions and list comprehensions.
Not only is there a UInt8Array, there’s also a bunch of others: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/TypedArray#typedarray_objects
Once git no longer depends on it, it’ll be gone from my system
Great point, but this part of the quote is still dumb as rocks:
Coding is just kind of like the language that we talk to computers. It’s not necessarily the skill in and of itself. The skill in and of itself is like, how do I innovate? How do I go build something that’s interesting for my end users to use?
Sure, if you have a big workforce hand-coding UI, you might replace some of them by better tools. But things like that are a fraction of a fraction of the responsibilities developers have
Yeah, the motivation here is “please panic-buy our GPUs/please panic-buy into our cloud GPU infrastructure ”
Again: not what the person said. They said that if someone proves that you host CSAM, you should take it down.
No, that’s not what the person is saying in the slightest. Just read their comment again, it’s actually very clear.
No. You can say that about so many laws being made, but telegram simply hosts the most vile shit.
You’re talking as if there weren’t pedagogic professionals who have solved this problem. If a child is that unwilling to conform even slightly, the child either has special needs and doesn’t belong there, or, more likely, there’s shit going down at the child’s home and CPS need to get involved.
I’m thoroughly baffled that you think there’s any kind of argument to be made for corporeal punishment. The scientific world has solved and moved on a century ago. The backwater sticklers who still don’t get it are harmful Luddites, not people with opinions to take seriously.
Wipe it off, tell the child in no uncertain terms that this is never acceptable, and if it continues being confrontational to that degree, send it to the principal’s office to get detention.
Negative rings are a horrible proprietary liability.
That’s been clear from their inception, and this changes nothing.
Huh, I really like code like that. Having a multi-step process split up into sections like that is amazing to reason about actual dependencies of the individual sections. Granted, that only applies if the individual steps are kinda independently meaningful
To adapt your example to what I mean:
Baz do_stuff(int count, boolean cond) {
Foo part1 = function1(count);
Bar part2 = function2(cond);
return function3(part1, part2);
}
This allows you to immediately see that part1 and part2 are independently calculated, and what goes into calculating them.
There are several benefits, e.g.:
Not just all cultures, all eras as well. From Mesopotamian stone slates over medieval hogshide, paper to the internet: boomers gonna complain
Unintentional incest is old, from Greek mythology.
You can theme plasma and turn the effects off. Why isn’t that exactly what you want?
Whoever dies first loses.