• 0 Posts
  • 274 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: September 9th, 2023

help-circle
  • Two mistakes:

    1. The all setting makes little sense, unless someone wants to enforce a zero-AI policy. It shouldn’t have been the default. In-line completions don’t justify attribution, so the chatAndAgents setting makes more sense (there can be more arguments made about uncopyrightable LLM output and the fact that “creation height” can’t be automatically determined)
    2. The code is bugged and attributed the contributions of other LLMs to copilot

    The one you cited is more of a safety measure against the intersection of these two issues: if the code would work correctly, it wouldn’t add the copilot line anyway.









  • flying_sheep@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlsystemd(ont)
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    Yeah, these people never do their research. Its very easy to find the discussions and reasoning the devs had at the time.

    That especially disqualifies the conspiracy idiots who come up with myths about Red Hat or Poettering or Microsoft or so puppeteering Linux into its dooooom


  • flying_sheep@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlsystemd(ont)
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    Nah, the issue is accidental corruption, different parsers doing things differently, stuff like that. Happens often with “mostly text but actually some structured data also” formats, doesn’t happen with formats that have well specified framing.








  • flying_sheep@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlsystemd(ont)
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    That old load of bullshit again. You could swap out the logs if you want a shittier, less searchable (but text based) logging system. The rest can be countered in a similarly conclusive way, and has been repeatedly in the last decade or so.

    Inform yourself before copy-pasting misinformation and misleading propaganda.