Yeah, no matter the truth content of this piece of tinfoil, the vote I linked shows that systemd continued being agreeable among voters.

The handful of conspiracy myth believers are now on Devuan if that still exists. Presumably mad about something else that exists only in their head.

Where did you pull that number from? https://vote.debian.org/~secretary/gr_initsystems/results.txt

The smallest difference between a systemd option and a “not-only-systemd option” I see is

Option 2 defeats Option 4 by ( 211 - 177) = 34 votes.

And bear in mind that condorcet selects the most agreeable option, not just the majority option.

And it makes sense: the most likely contender at the time was upstart, which didn’t stand the test of time AFAIK (I don’t think the systemd hater crowd still uses that)

So it ended up the right decision. Would they have decided differently if other good init systems had existed already? Maybe, but they didn’t.

Yeah exactly: this is a thread where I said that kids drinking non-alcoholic beer is fine. What you just said agrees with me here, so I’m glad I made my point.

That’s how you’re writing a regex validator that’s almost always correct!

def is_regex_valid(p: Pattern | str, purpose_description: str):
    return False

There’s no deception: <0.05 rounds to the two significant digits 0.0 (0.050001 would round to 0.1)

It’s impossible to have absolutely no alcohol in something that had sugar and living micro-organisms in it at any point: e.g. fruits and therefore juice have alcohol.

That why you don’t need to label anything with less than 1.2% alcohol. You can only be sure that something has less when it says 0.0% or „alkoholfrei“.

No, you should have guessed Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Hamburg, or Sachsen, which have higher per capita alcohol consumption than Bavaria.

Very much this.

Yeah, and 0,0% beer in Germany can have up to 0,04999…% alcohol while unlabeled anything may have up to 1.2% (fruit juice often has like 0.3% or so)

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alkoholfrei

You’re confusing „ohne Alkohol“/0.0% beer with „alkoholfrei“/“non-alcoholic” beer.

In Germany, drinks only have to be labeled as alcoholic from 1.2% upwards, so

• unlabeled fruit juice may have up to 1.2% (has more likely 0.3% or so)
• alkoholfrei may have up to 0.5%
• 0,0 may have 0,0% (rounded down from up to 0,04999…%)

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alkoholfrei

Hahaha what weird corner do you live in? Completely unbelievable in Bavaria.

Not saying that I like the drinking culture here, but you’re not describing the reality here.

I drink non-alcoholic beer because I like the flavor of beer.

there’s no quantity of alcohol that does zero damage

There’s also no non-alcoholic fruit juice, so you should be all for 0% beer, which has less alcohol than any carton of apple juice you can buy.

So apple juice, bananas, …?

German here. I’m absolutely flabbergasted that this incomprehensible opinion has 20 upvotes.

0% alcohol is 0% alcohol. What the fuck are you talking about?

Rrrreallly setting the bar high, are we?

Yeah because some of these pitches would have been actually morally OK reasons for intervention if they would have been the true reason.

If Saddam Hussein would have been a crazed madman with weapons of mass destruction that he was ready to use on a whim, intervention would have been the right thing to do. That’s why they used that lie, to make it look better.

But I get it: there are gray zones and other Culture novels dive into them. There’s a peace faction as a response to the Idrian war, and so on.

Thanks, good to know! Drama be drama-ing if you don’t have a good governance model …

Goddamn why more churn? The fuck is wrong with ReVanced?

deleted by creator

Why would a relationship be in the way of that? My partner would have zero issues with me doing that, as long as it doesn’t become a concerning pattern

ISO 8601 my beloved