![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/70c5fe07-4a33-494a-b67b-164287421a94.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/gWmVEUZ94Z.png)
what sabotage?
Conservative? Republican? Fuck yourselves. You’ll pay for your stupidity.
what sabotage?
Why would the NATO chief comment on the president’s health at all?
Obviously illegal order
Ahh of course, america has never once committed a war crime
you guys have cried about your guns for two hundred years in case of this exact situation
The first line of my reply literally says I dont think this is what you mean, BUT …. I very clearly stated I assume that isnt exactly what the commenter meant. The rest of my comment is to clarify what the poster defined as “protection”.
If someone came up to me and asked protect something, contextually yes obviously I understand that.
That isnt the situation here. The comment chain is someone with a “hot take” on what “parents protecting children” means. It being a hot take I feel it is completely valid to put aside any assumption that the commenter is talking about “well obviously I mean protect them from x y z”. Because its a potentially unpopular hot take. It’s not a common idea in society.
Unless you can read minds it is very possible this commenter meant it literally. IE how kids are raised in the film 300. “Heres a stick. go fight a wolf kid”.
Im not writing it off. I assumed what they meant but followed up for clarification. Did you just expect replies to be “agree” or “disagree” with zero further discussion?
unless mating season was like, autumn
its a hypothetical situation
usually because it becomes very obvious the poster doesn’t want help and just wants to whine.
The solution to loneliness? Meet people. Find something you enjoy and find a group you can meet, online or otherwise. Start to find ways to build relationships with people.
“But I cant do literally anything to meet anyone ever”
Laziness.
What the fuck else does that mean? If you want to believe you can read minds and assume what a person is talking about, whatever.
But if someone makes a statement, maybe take it at face value rather than “ah yes they must mean something else”
fucking idiot
which exploit a loophole on low valued goods
In the article.
In the EU, the threshold for the levy is €150 (£127) and in the UK it is £135
In the UK, items valued at £39 or less also do not attract import VAT.
Last year, 2.3bn items below the duty-free €150 threshold were imported into the EU
The ones I am talking about don’t move under their own weight and gravity. If you held it with the cap upwards, it doesn’t rotate downwards unless you do it yourself
hence why getting hit in the face and struggling with a little cap is so puzzling to me
less knife friendly
Most places are advanced enough to not require their citizens to carry weaponry.
needing to always be armed is a uniquely american problem
Does america have terrible bottle designs or something? Not one single bottle with tethered cap has ever freely spun, you can move it and it stays in that position
Parents jobs arent to protect their kids
I get you don’t mean this so broadly but you lose all nuance with this statement.
Protect them from every minor mistake or risk that could ever possibly happen, and smothering them? Sure.
Someone about to stab your kid? Protect them from predators? Protect them from various risks and hazards in life which every parent should be teaching them?
what i think when people struggle with the cap hitting their face
its the default for all reddit/lemmy/other style platforms. The default assumption is of course everyone (in general) will upvote their own post. So setting it by default no one gets an advantage.
and what you’re asking for is a disadvantage to your posts
barcode on your taint
please tell me more
Cat reasoning? “Cause fuck you thats why. Now pick it up the place is a mess. Fuck you”
couldnt you use device / hostname instead?