It is very complex. They are doing a lot of balancing in 1.0, so the it’ll probably be less brain breaking. Still complex I’m sure, though

For sure the same. Want to do a single player run, but multiplayer is a lot of fun. It turns some of the more ridiculous space elevator parts into a group project

This is one of my favorite movies. The first time i saw it, I was out camping with my friend’s family and his dad decided that he wanted to see a movie, so we drove an hour into town. Friend’s dad wanted to watch like Copland or something, and we asked if we could go watch Event Horizon instead. All of us thought it was just a sci-fi movie, so friend’s dad bought us tickets. My friend was covering his eyes or plugging his ears for a lot of that movie, but that is when I realized I love Sam Neill movies. Back at camp was a little rough for both of us though. Neither of us slept much

I love this movie but I do not know what you are referring to. It has been a while since watching it though.

something is unethical without stating or at least implying a specific ethical philosophy.

Which is why I followed it up by saying the best we can do is harm reduction by choosing the less harmful paths when we find them. Nothing you are saying is different to what I said, just a different wording

A. Not a “dude”

B. I’ll pose the same rhetorical as I did to the other person that didn’t think popularity was support:

If you see two pieces of identical software, one with 1000 downloads and one with 100,000, which would you choose?

I’m not sure of the origin, but that is a fair point. I typically us it in the context of there is no way to find a harm free source of anything in a capitalist society, so you have to find the path with the least amount of harm in it. That is basically what you are saying, but just tweaking the stated definition of ethical.

What? It was your hypothetical

Self described tankies.

If you see two pieces of identical software, one with 1000 downloads and one with 100,000, which would you choose?

Wow, what a slippery slope you’ve made.

Adding to popularity does support them.

Sure, there is no ethical consumerism under capitalism. But I can do harm reduction. When someone says or does something shitty, I can avoid or stop using their product. In your example, if a road worker came out publically with some transphobic nonsense, I could raise that to my local road authority and they would likely lose their job. Are there more people that have shitty views in this theoretical? Maybe, but they will be less likely to spew them if they know there are consequences.

Ope, yes indeed

Oh nice. Hadn’t heard a platform had been decided upon.

“What about the good things Hitler did?” Is not the flex you think it is. Also, using the Autobahn does not send support to Nazis

Good news, most folks at beehaw know and the admins have decided to move to a new platform

There is no way this is good. It has been in development hell for almost 10 years, and we have learned in recent years that the way to do good adaptations of video games is television or animated series.

I thought the FFVII remakes were pretty well received?

The other 5e based game, Solasta has custom campaigns. It is not as polished as BG3, but it is enjoyable