“…scholars consider Buddhism one of the major world religions.”

“Sikhism, [a] religion and philosophy…”

“Hinduism (/ˈhɪnduˌɪzəm/)[1][2] is an Indian religion or dharma…”

Your own sources say that all 3 are religions.

Your ignorance is genuinely louder. All of those are religions, and any credible source you find will agree with me.

All the examples I provided are religions.

Trump speaking out is a fair point, but there are plenty of cases where Trump has said one thing and done the exact opposite. Trump is heavily influenced by the people around him, and Project 2025 involves the recruitment of advisors so that a president would be ready on day 1. Even if Trump doesn’t like the policies in there right now, there is no doubt that he’ll get there one day, especially since he really does not know what he’s doing.

Secondly, the immunity ruling absolutely has changed a lot. I suggest watching LegalEagle’s perspective on it.

Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism are some, but Asia has many more religions/ideologies.

Trump literally made abortion illegal in about half of the US. Even ignoring that, our lives barely change because many of the institutions that the executive branch controls have employees who aren’t appointed and stick around between administrations. Well-funded conservatives made a plan (Project 2025) to reclassify those employees so they could be replaced with Trump loyalists. Considering that this affects agencies like the FDA, NOAA, and FTC, this will definitely impact normal people who rely on prescriptions being available or weather forecasts to know about storms.

He didn’t know what he was doing for much of his first term. For his second, he’ll have an instruction booklet that he just needs to follow and take credit for. Project 2025 and the recent SCOTUS immunity ruling are just 2 signs that show that a 2nd term will be so much worse.

It’s probably the latter.

“Delivering shareholder value” has destroyed numerous companies, and I doubt it’ll stop soon.

Their point is that there’s more than 1 widely-practiced religion, and there are plenty of sects that are tolerant to different forms of self-expression. Saying food is bad because you don’t like bananas isn’t sound logic, and applying that same logic to religion doesn’t work either.

I can’t speak for any Christians, but many of the religious people I know are some of the most tolerant people I know because their religious schools focused on doing things with good intent.

While you might be generally correct, some of the legislation passed during Biden’s term is genuinely better than what even Europe could come up with.

I hope this doesn’t spread to the US as although it’ll stop Temu and Shein, it’ll also probably make niche goods and hobbyist parts more expensive. I really don’t want to pay the Amazon tax if I can find the same thing on Aliexpress, and a duty would just shorten that gap.

It wouldn’t be limited to community releases, though. Other companies could poach the source code for themselves, and I doubt that’s something easy to regulate.

The US has had “secret voting” laws for a while, and although it’s not illegal to say you voted for X, it is illegal for anyone to pressure you into voting a certain way.

It also screws over the many churches or other religious organizations that genuinely do good for their communities

Can’t speak for previously, but recently, a good chunk of Democrats’ failures have been because of a select few members holding out, no?

As an oligarch, I can’t wait for Project 2025

The AI does nothing with the percentages because it is an LLM, not an AI designed for math. All an LLM does is take a small number of words and turn them into a different set of words. It does not use your small set of words to run any formulas on your behalf.

There’s a reason why Trump 2016, though it caused a lot of damage, wasn’t nearly as bad as it was thought to be.

Trump was probably the laziest president in US history. He had no clue what to do at the start of the presidency, and many of his requests were met with resistance by employees in the executive branch because they were stupid or illegal. This is because the executive branch has a small chunk of president-appointed positions relative to the merit-based chunk.

Many of his successes came about later in his term, as he got plenty of help from well-funded right-wing organizations to find people to appoint to various positions, including the 3 Supreme Court justices who helped remove federal abortion protections.

If you look forward to now, the same right-wing organizations have prepared a document (Project 2025) serving as instructions for Trump’s first 180 days. It calls for reclassifying every merit-based position in the executive branch into political ones, replacing the people who serve in those positions with Trump loyalists, then dismantling organizations like the FBI, EPA (environmental regulation), NOAA (meteorological organization; helps detect hurricanes), DOJ (sues entities for reasons like antitrust), and more. The only entities that could intervene in this case are the Supreme Court, which is very comfortably on Trump’s side, and Congress, which is very unlikely to be controlled by Democrats in a way that will matter.

Tl;dr, Trump didn’t know what to do during the first term. For his second term, he was handed a step-by-step tutorial on how to dismantle the FBI and everything else in the executive branch.

For some justices, I agree. However, as a general principle, I think of the vast majority of “bad people” as incompetent rather than malicious unless there’s proof of guilt. I don’t know enough about all 9 justices to comfortably say they’re evil or corrupt.

It’s simply an institution meant to interpret laws and their legality. All of that goes out the window when the people in said institution are politically charged, corrupt, or make bad arguments.