His crypto monologue in out of the episodes killed it for me. I didn’t disagree on the ideals, if i remember right, but it was just disconnected from reality. It was a “if he is that willfully ignoring reality because he is passionate, maybe I shouldn’t listen to him when he is talking about something that he is passionate about.”

Okay, so when workers cause damages to the society to stand up to the capitalists and fight against exploition of labour, that is cool.

When people find it funny that capitalists aren’t checking their sources while exploiting labour, then that is not cool.

Your perspective is at least as good as mine, I never smoked.

Well, you started smoking at some point for some reason. Either social pressure or you liked it.

Not calling you stupid, or saying that you are entirely wrong, but maybe consider that another smoker is at a different spot than you, right now. We humans like to repeat the mistakes of others.

I want to congratulate you for stopping!

Don’t get me wrong… but I hope college level is better than that.

Out of curiosity, what do you think about protests? And strikes? Like union strikes?

They are “guns don’t kill people”-ing it. Ignore them.

This sounds like guns don’t kill people, people do!

Well he isn’t… he just kinda dismisses gender if i understood him right… like he listened and choose this.

It means that he believes a sentient human can not transition by their own choice but he gets transition a sentient AI as he wishes.

And honestly, I think that highlights the issue if transition means he gets to have a woman submit to his every word, he supports it. So any transwoman who are into old white men and fulltime submission kink? There is an opportunity!

Always remember, he believes that trans people can’t transition as they can’t change their biological sex.

But he calls an ai without biological sex and with a male coded name, the female version of that name. So trans people can’t change their gender because of biological sex buz he can change the gender of an ai.

It is clearly not a hijab.

Yeah. Same.

Fair enough while I have opinions.

But it makes me wonder if OP actually used idle for very lazy or if they never actually read their own post.

Very lazy = idle?

No? Or is my english bad?

Yeah! Once a teacher was mad at me for being too quick and when she checked to scold me, everything was correct…

Weird example but ok.

And no, it is not only historical. I stated that in my original comment and I invite you to look at left wing politics but some “left wing” politician’s position on some random issue, but a widely supported position by the left wing community. You will see that they are all in opposition of hierarchy.

But let’s take your weirdly racist example, where is the hierarchy?

That is nonsense.

The left was coined by its opposition to the monarchy while the right supported it.

So left has been currently and historically speaking in opposition of hierarchies and in favor of equality.

The right consequently has been in favor of hierarchies.

Every significant AI company makes their best efforts to stop it.

Someone should have told him that Elon “stopped” it by trying to make money from it.

Oh my god… you can use that as a perfect example how evolution is not creating the best designs and how if there is a designer… we should have questions.