I know they’re mutual funds but there was rules if I remember that didn’t allow the 401k funds to be used for high risk stocks like these.

Did the rule that allows 401k to be invested in stocks like this shit get passed? Cause that’s going to fuck so many peoples retirement (mine included). And when these companies pop, we’re going to be holding the bag.

It’s not even that, building a firearm…is legal…this shit going after printers makes no sense at all, it’s fucking legal to print firearm parts.

What sucks is that it ruins relationships for those of us who know the person has it but they don’t think they do or use the Internet to do a “lol I have ADHD, what’s your super power?”. I have a ton of sympathy for you all who know you have it and want help but have docs who think you’re just fine, because everyone these days runs around saying they have it.

If you can’t tell I’m dealing with this situation, and they are basically pushing me away because they think they’re just fine, and I’m the issue. Yet all their relationships always end in the other person being the issue, and everyone being against them. ADHD sucks and it’s so shit how social media has turned it into just some joke. Like it’s a “hah” disorder and not a life altering disorder that needs serious help.

Well they’ll have the insider knowledge before anyone else.

It is odd that the 3 big players are trying to rush to IPO… probably to dump their shit and cash out before the bag holders have time to sell… I’ve got a feeling they know it’s going to crash soon.

And those of us who don’t have it but live with someone who does and doesn’t think they need meds to help… it’s a terrible disorder that doesn’t just effect the person who has it. I really really hate that it’s downplayed so much on the Internet.

No they were not, that was the last time most younger people were able to afford homes.

https://www.thezebra.com/resources/home/housing-trends-visualized/

The median house of 1960 would cost just $104,619 in 2020 dollars, far below the actual cost of $240,500, meaning housing costs have increased by 129%.

Homes have become less affordable: In 1960, approximately 68 out of 100 Americans could afford a home, but now only around 43 out of 100 can afford one.

Among 18 to 34 year olds, nearly twice as many people live at home with their parents in 2020 than in 1960.

Even in the 90s when the rates were in the teens more people owned homes.

The average age for first time home owners has gone up a lot as well.

Low rates do not equal more affordable housing, they end up pricing people out of the market at a much greater rate.

Which is completely irrelevant, since the claim is for age 1-19.

Yes it is relevant, because it drives a false narrative. People don’t hear suicide, they hear “4 year olds are being gunned down”.

Duh of course it has?!?! Only sick countries like USA or very poor countries don’t.

Cool so you understand something at least on the topic.

Again completely irrelevant if it also is for over 90 year olds. This is for 1-19.

It’s not, as I explained above.

It is as the article states, hildren and adolescents. How the fuck is that so hard for you to grasp?

Again… because it’s not the same as a literal child being killed by a firearm and a teenager that commits suicide. They’re two massively different issues.

Yes because USA is a sick society. Unfortunately there are no real signs of that fundamentally changing.

Plenty of us are trying to change it, but all you are doing is feeding into the “guns are the issue and the only solution is to ban them” agenda that’s being continually pushed, so the ultra rich can divide the people while not actually focusing on the why.

Yep, it’s terrible. Poverty is driving our violence. If we focused as much money on our inner cities as we do with rich neighborhoods, I guarantee you violence would drop drastically.

Mortgage interest rates were in the high teens

And it kept the price of houses affordable. The interest rates today are stupid low and are what caused the shit market we have now.

No I don’t it clearly states already in the first line of the article:

Children are in that line…which is not true. Firearms for children are not their number one cause. Adolescents 15-19 yes, because of suicide.

I just checked the causes of death for my own country, and firearms or other weapons don’t even register.

I’m betting your own country also has safety nets, a focus on healthcare, education and not locking up everyone for minor drug offenses…

The reasons are Cancer, traffic accidents, other accidents, suicide. Below 1 year, it’s near 100% birth defects or whats called cradle death, where the baby dies suddenly in its sleep for no known reason.

Which is what ours is for children.

Yes here too is the highest rate among the 1-19 year olds also between 15-19. But NONE are from firearms! And so few from other weapons that it isn’t even in the statistic.

Which is great, but the USA doesn’t have a firearm issue, we have a societal one. We don’t support our citizens and we lock up the parents or have them working 3 jobs. We create broken homes and ignore education.

The fact remains that USA is a sick society, that lets its children be shot by legal firearms,

You didn’t but just at the start here you said:

No I don’t it clearly states already in the first line of the article:

So which is it? You know it’s suicide from adolescents or children being shot?

and allows extreme poverty that increases violent crimes.

Couldn’t agree with you more.

The problem here is your thinking prevent you from realizing how sick USA is as a society.

Not even close. All I’m expressing is that guns are here to stay, and more people own them more than ever, instead of spending the political capital on trying to ban them, we should be spending it on fixing our society…aka the why people turn to violence and suicide here in the USA…and I can tell you this, it’s not because of guns.

The problem here is your thinking it’s a toddler being killed by a firearm. It’s not. That largest group is 15-19 year olds. Who unfortunately are the high risk group for suicide. We should be focused on how to solve the why part of this group committing suicide, instead of focusing political capital on trying to ban guns.

It seems most people who have issues with the new lights already have vision issues to begin with and would have the same issue with the gold/yellow halogen lights anyways but probably don’t remember. As I can damn near look at the new LEDs and do not get blinded at all by them but the old lights if the vehicle forgot to turn off their brights.

I must be taking crazy pills…the title and comment is all about how we just accept this and how manufacturers are racing to make lights as bright as the sun. No where in the comment of this post does it say misaligned.

It really is, the OP is asking why there isn’t more regulation to stop companies from swapping to the LEDs, and the statistics say that there doesn’t need to be because they’re safer.

This is like asking why they don’t regulate 3 point seatbelts cause it irritates some peoples necks…and we should go back to lap belts.

Not even the same. LEDs statistically are better for helping light up the roads during the night, and reducing lack of visibility crashes.

https://landline.media/blinded-by-the-light-are-newer-headlights-putting-drivers-at-risk/

When I mean toe shoes, I don’t mean the ones that look like you got toes. I mean that they’re not like running shoes or well any other shoe that has a hard sole. More like you said ballet shoes but more flex and grip.

There are some I have worked for that also believe the earth is 6k years old and that evolution is fake and that dinosaurs weren’t real… plenty of idiots in stem fields.

Proper shoes for climbing are basically bare feet. You’re issue will be your weight, but you’ll lose that the second you start climbing. Go to a bouldering gym and give it a go again. It’s extremely fun and sans the cost of the shoes cheap to do.