![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/h1ChnLuBHr.png)
What’s the pushback against it? I like that you can modify and publish version of it as long as it’s noncommercial
Edit: I don’t understand the down votes, I’m trying to learn - what are the downsides of this thatkmake so unpopular?
What’s the pushback against it? I like that you can modify and publish version of it as long as it’s noncommercial
Edit: I don’t understand the down votes, I’m trying to learn - what are the downsides of this thatkmake so unpopular?
Are you an expert tho
Lisan al Gaib
Anecdotally, so far I’ve noticed cars getting louder
Exacerbate = the rare minerals issue?
I also don’t trust them that they won’t sell my data if I pay them
Not at all actually, maybe for my parents
Been using buckwheat pillows since I was a kid, they’re awesome
Do you game with friends? If so, what do you use instead of discord?
Hopefully they’ll do a freemium service at some point like Proton does
Will probably omly bolster their believers
Still sucks ifyou can get in
I’d put the blame on the branding, full self drive shluld mean full self drive, not most-conditions self drive without explicitly providing the limitations. Even irplane autopilot systems, which solve a simpler problem, have explicit limitations stated
Are there notes available to read?
I feel like “threat model” can distance people away from privacy communities, i.e. thinking you need a threat to get privacy. I certainly avoid using it because of that opinion. I wish there was a more approachable non-security term for it, like “data priority” or something like that.
Again, just my opinion and how I react to hearing “threat model” (as a privacy advocate myself).
Aurora Boreholeanus
TIL
https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/wiki/4_freedoms