I mean all wood is edible for the most part. It’s also in a lot food!

Cellulose! It’s used to keep your shredded cheese from sticking together.

Just chewing on a twig of oak or fir isn’t gonna kill you.

Sure, but people STILL knock on the doors. They likely didn’t participate in a conspiracy to get it, sorry.

Turn off the motion sensor and only use the push activation, that wouldn’t break the “auto” recording portion. There’s always exemptions, security and law professionals wouldn’t be left without a way to assist themselves.

Umm… that could have just been the other driver asking the person for their footage from the camera they saw.

Not everything is a conspiracy dude, that’s commonly done after any incident lmfao.

I have cameras and plenty of people have asked me for random footage for thefts and collisions, none being a company or insurance, always the person affected…

Edit, sorry I guess once the police did, but still there’s nothing odd or weird about what happened to you.

No, I’m asking you. Because you seem to be applying the law to stuff it doesn’t apply to, so I’m trying to figure out your knowledge on it, so we can figure out where you went wrong.

And who said ALL the time, security cameras use motion, or a host of other tech to not record all the time and NOT store it. So which law do you think is being broken?

You are asininely saying that if I took a picture of someone throwing something on my house, that would be inadmissible because the street was in it…? Is that what you think the law is doing here…?

Front yards aren’t…

And you can’t record a public street for security? Even if it’s deleted? That makes absolutely no sense, how would you ever catch a crime?

Would be more of a broth or a tea no? There’s no substance which a soup usually has.

Front yards don’t have the expectation of privacy… that applies to backyards doesn’t it?

Just infuse the oil to make the dough.

That’s a credit union, not a bank. Just like 7-11 atms won’t have them either, it’s only bank atms at the branch’s.

Except most people use multiple cards, multiple banks etc. there will absolutely need to some visual verification to be able to ever establish a starting point. It just doesn’t work.

It’s a neat proof of concept, but in reality, that would never hold up in court.

Give your head a shake, I’ve got a bridge to sell you if you actually believe this is being used or can be used for what you claim.

I would expect a couple hundreds back if I use a thousand dollar bill.

Still legal tender, still required to be accepted.

There’s Noise everywhere, it’s a neat proof of concept, but it’s not gonna be used for what the user claimed.

One example I mentioned in my comment you’re replying to is check cashing services. Millions of people in the US receive money via things like check or money order and need to change it to cash despite not having a bank account to deposit it in; this usually involves identifying themselves.

…

Those are done at a teller, not an ATM. An ATM requires a bank card, cashing a cheque at a teller does not. The post and everything that’s being discussed is about ATM tracking…

It doesn’t make sense when you actually understand how the system works… but of course people that don’t quite understand the system can be fooled by how it’s possible. But it isn’t, and not for the reasons you’ve suggested, as I’ve countered. It just doesn’t make sense because of all the NOISE.

For cashback? Why wouldn’t they. That’s also why this system makes no sense, avoid the atm, use cashback. Fuck everyone’s metrics up.

There are close to 2 billion unbanked people in the world. In the US, it’s less than 6% nationally, but over 10% in some states.

……

If they don’t use a bank, how are they pulling money out for it to be tracked?

See, none of it makes any sense lmfao.

The cash serial number tracking being described in this thread is useful for locating the neighborhoods frequented by someone who (a) avoids using electronic payments, and (b) maybe obtains cash from an ATM (or perhaps check-cashing service, in the case of an unbanked person) in places other than the neighborhoods they live in or frequent.

Which is useful to who…? The only time that information is useful, would be for an investigator, so… again… someone, boots on the ground, and doing visual verification. And an investigator and plenty of other useful metrics with less noise.

It

Makes

Zero

Sense

In

Reality!

The person originally started talking about spending habits, and shifted to finding criminals. Those are two whole-fully different situations that need different information points, and are also gathered in significantly different methods.

Bank ATMs can give out any denomination.

I ONLY give other people cash, all my other purchases are debit/credit. Like MOST people and stores since Covid

The only time this works, is if it’s targeted, and that means an investigator is doing it. An automated system wouldn’t know what to do with any of the data. You’re severely overestimating how much people spend cash around them, that’s usually when it’s plastic. People use cash in “sketchier” places.

Again, zero basis on reality, it gets “destroyed” at every step without some manual intervention.

Without some type of visual confirmation, it’s all noise.

On my way home from work, I grab $600 from the atm, $300 for my wife’s tattoo, $200 for me, and $100 for wife spending money.

After the appt the tattoos artists wife takes $200 and flys across country that night. I spend my $200 at the peelers, all those go to a dozen different girls and servers. My wife the next day goes shopping at an outlet mall and spends her $100 at 4 stores. The tattoo artist spends his $100 on beer.

We live on the same block and I pulled the money out across town. Who’s is the original takers purchases….?

It’s 95% noise, it’s useless unless you’re an investigator and have boots on the ground.

Again, it’s a fun story to share around the campfire though. Is it possible, yes, can it be done in actual practice, absolutely not. Not without some other information.

That’s completely made up. Most bills are given out to other customers once used in a store, the amount of bills that are used once and returned to the bank would be well under 5%.

Fantastic fabricated story though. Money laundering which has been done for decades would defeat this, it’s a scary story to share that has zero basis on reality.