Hits all the hallmarks of a shitpost. 👌
Butter with the dog on em.
2·4 months agoJust burn your worn clothes and buy new ones; the true fashion industry experience.
21·4 months agoGo get bitches.
https://lemmy.world/post/17025152
https://lemmy.world/comment/10767468Both are shitposts, bruh.
One is literally a shitpost from a prominent shitposter. (What, you really think Trump and Biden were making out during the debate?)
The other is a shitpost targeted to fuck with a particular community, in a manner that’s intentionally provocative; Mockery and Amusement, and ironically, trollishly poor quality and absurd, exaggeration, etc.
Felt more shitposty without text.
The judgment from the mods should be enough for you. Their judgment very clearly makes it evident that they didn’t remove it because it broke rules or wasn’t a shitpost, but because people were spamming them.
It doesn’t matter anymore, too large a handful of users here have too large a stick up their ass.
Nope. It was never about saying I was funny, it was about some peoples complete lack of understanding of what a shitpost even is and spamming false reports.
Why the hell do you think I used multiple examples from prominent shitposters.
“yUo cAn’T sHitPosT”
Ok Boomer https://lemmy.world/post/15893294 (trollishly poor quality, low effort, absurd, off-topic & irrelevance, deliberately provocative; Amusement, absurdist & mocking wordplay.)
Bruh :
https://lemmy.cafe/post/5927986 (trollishly poor quality, low effort, confusing out of context, off-topic)
https://lemmy.world/post/17037401 (trollishly poor quality, absurd, deliberately provocative; Engagement, Amusement, Relatability, Dread)
https://lemmy.world/post/17025932 (trollishly poor quality, low effort, absurd, off-topic, deliberately provocative; Amusement, Dismissal, Mockery)
https://feddit.it/post/8982157 (trollishly poor quality, low effort, Absurdist, Pun, Visual metaphor/Visual Joke, deliberately provocative; Amusement)
https://lemmy.world/post/17025152 (trollishly poor quality, low effort, absurd, deliberately provocative; Amusement, Dismissal, Mockery, exaggeration)
https://lemmy.cafe/post/5945676 (trollishly poor quality, low effort, absurd, off-topic, deliberately provocative; Amusement, Dismissal, Mockery, exaggeration)
https://lemmy.world/post/16276064 (poor quality, low effort, absurd, off-topic, provocative; Amusement, Dismissal, Mockery)
https://lemmy.world/post/17040641 (trollishly poor quality, absurd, deliberately provocative; Amusement, Disgust)
That’s not a shitpost, that’s a basic meme that took effort to make and come up with, it’s only absurd for comedic effect & low-effort. It’s not trollishly low-quality, nor meet enough of the other key hallmarks to condone qualifying as a shitpost.
^Actual shitpost, AI generated image with text slapped on it. Another example is the common “all Linux users are femboys” memes/inside joke. They are intentionally poor quality, absurd, and designed to provoke reactions with minimal effort.
The “average X fan vs average Y enjoyer” meme is another good example of a shitpost. It’s intentionally provocative through its absurd comparison and exaggeration.“aggressively, ironically, and trollishly poor quality… cause the biggest reaction with the least effort. …internet mockery… …absurd… …confusing… …awkward and irrelevant…”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shitposting
My post that was unfairly removed was intentionally provocative (Oxford), and ironically, trollishly poor quality (Wikipedia) and exaggeration, just as the example shitposts provided are.
provocative ≠ inflammatory
Provocative : causing annoyance, anger, or another strong reaction, especially deliberately.
Inflammatory : deliberately arousing or intended to arouse angry or violent feelings.(Oxford)
Provocative in the context of shitpost essentially means deliberately causing a strong reaction usually via exaggeration for comedic effect.
While Inflammatory just means to deliberately insight violence usually via slander or liable.Another shitpost for example :
This meets : intentionally provocative (Oxford), and ironically, trollishly poor quality and absurd, exaggeration, etc. (Wikipedia).
The funny thing is, it had over 100 up votes and only a handful of down votes. People must have been spamming.
That’s the Oxford definition the Wikipedia has a better definition.
How funny would it be if they both lost and we voted 3rd party?
It is a tankie wiki, but what a better way to expose their tankie nature than the tankies themself.
I don’t disagree with you whatsoever…
I’d however like to also mention that people like “veganteacher” need to stop equating feeding your child some steak to rape…