• 2 Posts
  • 575 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 22nd, 2023

help-circle










  • I guess Trump made this specific accusation because he saw the headlines about him making at least $1.4 billion in his first year back in office, and felt he needed to poison the well.

    I know the DOJ has no credibility anymore, but god, imagine a world where they did their job and investigated the $400 million jet, the hundreds of millions of untraceable crypto and meme coins he’s started that foreign actors could use anonymously in violation of FECA and Constitutional emoluments restrictions, the “Board of Peace” donation fund controlled by Trump personally…





  • I think this is going to hit like in other industries like programming, and disproportionately affect new artists, artists that are themselves still learning what they like.

    Some “tech forward” artists will try to not fight the wave, start using AI, and their drawing skills will never develop, leaving them dependent on it with a ceiling to what they can produce.

    Other artists will be blocked and they can never jump from the high-school doodle to one-shot to series steps because the quality curve will become a 90° wall.

    Other artists like Inio Asano or similarly innovative newcomers who are just legitimate geniuses will break through, because AI can’t come close to having so innovative or compelling authorial or artistic voice.


  • Buddy, I mean you no injury as I said, but what exactly are you trying to do here?

    I stated that the article was behind a paywall to disclaim, and it was to be honest. If you look at my comment history, you’ll see I’m not like a Reddit karma farmer, just posting superficial headline hot takes. I tried to access the article, saw enough to comment, you responded rudely, so I did what you didn’t - I reflected and thought, sure, better to see all of it, and tracked down the archive link (it’s easy to include that in your post, but sure, I can look it up).

    But no, after reading the article, I stand by my comments for the reasons I already gave.

    I don’t know who hurt you or why you’re so aggressive, but you’re being very belligerent, and you’re digging in deeper making even more personal attacks. I mean this genuinely: what’s your problem? Really don’t get it.


  • My commentary wasn’t meant to be an insult to you, but it sounds like you’re taking it personally? My statement wasn’t an “admission” it was a disclaimer.

    The comments I made continue to apply, because that is the characterization in those paragraphs. The fact that the article gives more context doesn’t obviate the propaganda effect of the framing characterizations.

    That said, the same issue appears in the full article:

    • The federal judges of eastern Virginia didn’t “question” the legitimacy of her role (4th ¶), they ruled it was illegitimate.

    • Alina Habba didn’t “resign” ((8th ¶) as both characterized here and in the WSJ’s linked prior reporting), she was likewise an invalid appointment.

    • The story also ends with a takeaway quote from Bondi making her look reasonable and sad about the departure, rather than leaving with the truth as found by the courts. That end quote has no value except to both-sides/normalize Bondi and the DOJ’s contemptuous and unconstitutional conduct.


  • The article is paywalled but even in the short summary the WSJ is misreporting in favor of the Trump administration.

    Halligan was not serving and did not step down because her 120-day appointment expired, and she ceased to be a US Attorney but kept impersonating one anyway. Then Bondi tried to create a “special counsel” role that did the US Attorney’s job but skirted the time limit. The court rejected this and ordered Halligan to stop acting like a US Attorney, so she stopped instead of being held in contempt.

    Halligan couldn’t step down. She was already down. The court didn’t “question her appointment.” They judged she was not properly appointed. This performative action didn’t “cap a fraught tenure” because her appointment was already nullified by the court.

    Not surprising with a Murdoch rag, but I hate subtle propaganda like this.