

Doesnt even kind of answer my question.
Doesnt even kind of answer my question.
Got rid of netflix when they started their ad tier. NEVER going back.
Can anyone tell me who’s actually right that GD conflict, at this point I think we’d be better off nuking the area and going on with life. Its been decades, time for actual resolution.
Reuse clip or twist and tuck are the only appropriate methods.
I used plex like a decade ago is it still the only decent option for gile share streaming?
Hot sauce is for people who dont enjoy taste.
Removed by mod
How about instead of assuming i’m dumb, you answer th… no fuck it. I dont think theres any value to be had here. Goodbye.
Not if youre being a cunt.
Love me some JL. “Tea. Earl grey. Hot.”
I feel like this is what angry old irish catholic nuns think all the time.
Amen.
Ill put it on the list
Well if we follow that to its conclusion I may as well delete the thread and try not to think about it.
Maybe it’s kind to not let people take advantage, force them to rely on themselves, thats a kindness.
Yep, that all tracks for me, is there anything underneath the golden rule, a more base rule, if you will.
Like what about people who have different lines over what would trigger a physical response to hostility? One guy might only respond to direct physical attacks, and another will respond to verbal threats of physical attacks. Who’s right?
How do you feel about the trolley problem?
That’s a historic meme right thare
My local model gave me this, I’m gonna go with this.
"The statement you’ve shared expresses a strong viewpoint on a highly complex and deeply contentious issue. While it’s rooted in real events—such as the displacement of Palestinians and the loss of civilian life—the way it’s framed is not fully accurate or nuanced when examined from a factual and historical perspective. Here’s a breakdown:
What’s true:
In 1948, the creation of the state of Israel was followed by war and the displacement of approximately 700,000 Palestinians—this is known as the Nakba (“catastrophe” in Arabic).
Since then, Palestinians have lost significant territory, and many still live as refugees or under occupation in the West Bank and Gaza.
Thousands of Palestinian civilians have indeed been killed over decades, especially in Israeli military operations in Gaza and the West Bank.
Civilian casualties are a well-documented and tragic part of the conflict.
What’s oversimplified or inaccurate:
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is widely regarded by historians, diplomats, and political scientists as one of the most complex geopolitical conflicts in modern history, involving:
Colonial history (British Mandate)
Competing nationalisms
Religion
Refugee crises
International law
Military occupation and terrorism
Internal divisions within both Israeli and Palestinian societies
Comparing the conflict to the Holocaust, where 6 million Jews were systematically murdered in a state-run genocide, is historically and morally problematic.
The Holocaust was a uniquely industrialized genocide driven by Nazi ideology. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, while tragic and violent, is not a genocide by definition, though some may argue aspects of it have genocidal characteristics.
The comparison risks minimizing the Holocaust and oversimplifying the current conflict.
Jews under Nazi rule had almost no means of organized resistance, facing a totalitarian regime bent on extermination.
Palestinians, particularly groups like Hamas, do engage in armed resistance and terrorism, including rocket attacks and suicide bombings, which target civilians and are widely condemned internationally.
This is not morally or tactically equivalent to the Jewish resistance in WWII.
Conclusion:
Your statement reflects a valid emotional and moral reaction to real suffering and injustice. However, from a factual and historical standpoint, it oversimplifies a deeply complex situation and makes inappropriate historical analogies.
If you’re interested, I can offer a more balanced summary of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the key historical events."