That’s not “his” evil plan

Fair, but as the puppet in this theater of government takeover, he is culpable.

which doesn’t even include the president for life part, that was wishful thinking out loud

Clearly, him wishing to be a dictator does not concern you…

the part about jailing opponents is mainly related to those who exploited due process in the political sphere in the past eight years

Can you outline these for me, with some references? The list is:

• Joe Biden
• Kamala Harris
• Mitch McConnell
• Chuck Schumer
• Mike Pence
• Liz Cheney

are we really going to hold someone accountable just because of their toxic fandom?

Absolutely, when he stands by them.

What has Trump actually done that screams “I am an outright villain for this nation, fear me”?

Do you mean besides the evil plan (project 2025), his explicit statements of becoming “president for life”/overstepping the bounds of the 2-term presidency, talking about jailing his opponents (including some republicans), his associates calling for violence, his lawyers referencing immunity to political violence (military assasination of a political rival), and an actual insurrection by his followers?

marijuana is a registered drug because of its ‘danger’, but alcohol is not. it would be comical if it wasnt so sad

Worse, it’s a “schedule 1” drug, which is defined as having:

• a high potential for abuse.
• no currently accepted medical treatment use in the U.S. Drugs.com

Interestingly enough, that definition fits one of these substances, but it’s not pot.

At least I’m not the only one. I drink vodka when I drink because it tastes like nothing. Beer and wine are both terrible.

From the link:

And despite what you may have heard, pusillanimous does not serve as the basis for pussyfoot, pussycat, or a certain related vulgarism.

Google Translate Translation link

Yeah, you aren’t maxthrifting and miserpilled enough.

I’m using my app’s built in video player and I guess it didn’t recognize the time stamp. I wanted to give people an idea of the context because I think it’s worth a watch. I’ll give that timestamped portion a watch later.

The title of this video is “An Anarchistic Watches West Wing” or something similar. I only watched 20mins but it was good so far. It’s a criticism of the American Capitalist system, American Democracy (power of the president, presidential hero worship), etc. via the way it’s portrayed in the West Wing.

There’s not a mechanism for it.

Democrats can name anyone as candidate at the convention in August. Biden being the candidate isn’t official yet.

The school already had single stall bathrooms for fuck sake! I use a non-gender conforming bathroom at work all the time even though it’s labeled “men” and “women” because I can close the door and no one can see me and it’s exactly the same as the other! And using kids pronouns? You use kids pronouns all the time, just this time you use the one they want.

Close-minded people trying to ruin literal children’s education because they are too fragile of snowflakes to take the signs off of bathrooms and use a different pronoun than they feel is “right”. Honestly, it’s good this came out, because the kids would have probably been bullied anyway from the kids with shitty parents. Now the parent can pick a more appropriate school.

Mr. Bizkit will not be taking questions regarding the reasoning behind his analysis and has, in fact, become quite agitated.

Except, as we’ve found in this thread, Germany is cool with shooting down drones over your property but the US is not.

Presence of some supreme creator may not be proven or disproven, but I think most of the anti-evolution stuff and similar things in most mainstream religions would face more questions when scientific temper improves.

And religions can evolve with this (or die from declining membership), as long as the leaders don’t stick to the “These actually scientifically proven facts are lies sent by the Devil” line.

You forgot wrapped up in culture wars.

Security theater, just like signatures for credit cards. At least they’re doing away with those.

The fact that he did a “prove me wrong” instead of a “here’s the proof” tells me, at minimum, had a suspicion that the proof had no merit.

But they defer to the states in legal states.

Crossing state lines is interstate commerce, and that is federal jurisdiction.