What does “statistically” mean to you?

Oh I thought you were saying that’s why Wendy’s was going out of business, because they didn’t pay their workers enough.

Eliminating opposition is an even simpler fix. It’s unlikely and it should be unlikely because that’s a dangerous road to go down.

How did stagnated wages hurt their sales?

Good thing they aren’t the final arbiter of truth, the all knowing, omniscient, all powerful enforcer of that which is true and just. But you aren’t either, so its good that you also don’t have that power.

Uhh, seems like it’s way more “fashionable” for Europeans to bash the US if anything.

Voter ID is a weird hill to die on. Most of the world requires it, for obvious reasons. It really shouldn’t be a partisan issue.

This is why i don’t buy the conspiracy that he is still alive. I can’t imagine what the powers that be would have to gain by letting him live. He’s much too dangerous.

You shouldn’t need a discriminatory law to allow it. Your resume speaks for itself. It might feel good to do something like this, but it’s flawed from the start and we shouldn’t start down that path.

Well you have to convict them first

Not to be that guy, but I can’t see this ever holding up or getting approved in the first place. As of now there is no way to discriminate based on previous occupation. The only legal grounds for job discrimination currently in California is based on being a sexual predator or violent felon. Even regular felons are allowed to be teachers. Not sure it’s a good idea to go down the path of allowing job discrimination based on what your previous job was, particularly when it’s a completely legal occupation.

Yeah that’s one criteria for selective enforcement, but lately it’s also been happening along political party lines.

Like immigration laws? There has always been selective enforcement.

Democrats have more to gain from ICE shooting people than Trump does.

At what point in history was true ownership established? Who are the rightful caretakers?

It helps to think of getting sick as the price you pay for boosting your immune system.

So basically anyone who wants to come here can come as long as they are law abiding and not diseased or whatever?

How do you have open borders and yet restrict criminals or suspected terrorists from entering? Either you have no restrictions or you have some restrictions. If you have some restrictions then you will have illegals that need to be deported which means you will need some kind of enforcement to do the deporting. There is no feasible way to run a modern country with truly open borders.

It also won’t prevent you from collecting a gang and bullying people.

So nothing then. If you want something then you take it, if you are more powerful. That sounds problematic.