It’s just twitter and a zoom clone right?

Don’t worry, there’s the insurrection and riots next.

Considering it’s a Russian mine, no different than Trump’s “concept of a plan”

There’s already SASE solutions that host a virtual browser boundary-side and present the user a painted canvas rather than the original DOM:

Example - Prisma Access

Example - Zscaler Cloud Browser

I don’t get why twitter wouldn’t just comply & implement measures the moment it knew it’s platform was being used to distribute CSAM.

Well technically he is now…

I couldn’t care less

Lawyers are legally obligated to be advocates for their clients. They have to pursue arguments which may strength their cases.

This may be their only avenue for a defence strategy.

“I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.”

Ita also trivial to come to the same conclusion at a smaller scale.

You can run a LLM at home and see the amount of GPU & power resources it takes to compute the larger models. If I ran that full time, your household bill will most likely be 3x alone.

Same stance the UK Post Office took with Horizon. A fucking stupid stance…

This an American thing? This is exactly what happens in the UK.

The key differences is utilities you’re paying for the generation & maintenance of key resources - without gas, water and electricity we wouldn’t be able to survive. Road tax you’re helping to pay for the renewal and upkeep of the road surface (among other local services)… Left alone the road will degrade & will become unusable.

Suspension as a Service is milking what should be a perpetual cost when purchasing the vehicle. If the hardware is already installed, it should be available for the owner to use. They’re not paying for the upkeep of the vehicle, or even ensuring the suspension remains functional… All they’ve done is placed the function behind a pay wall. They can argue they’re maintaining the software, but it’s utter bullshit and I hate the fact this has become a norm within B2B (for example network appliances)

At least with luxury subscriptions such as Spotify, Netflix, NYT, etc you’re getting access to their content, which they renew. Here you get access to something you should have had access to from day 1.

Perhaps the racist chanting and the nazi salutes have something to do with it. Who knows!

It wouldn’t stop against volumetric attacks…

They’d still fully consume the WAN bearer regardless of Crowdsec protecting the endpoint. For that you need a scrubbing centre to dump the traffic onto.

Why? Its hardware is dog shit.

I’m assuming now that the Post Office is under criminal investigation for fraud, the mutual assistance act between UK and Australia might be used to compel her instead? Especially considering Vennels pointed the blame at her.

Assuming, of course, that the investigators deem her an important cog in the scandal too.

The healthy food options are also usually twice the cost too.

Much like naming a company “X”

Zero sympathy. If they wanted to reduce the amount of illegal streamers, all they’ve got to do is make their content more accessible.

Release it on multiple streaming platforms, not just their own. Ensure its released globally at the same time. And get rid of the geo-blocking.

The lack of reasonable legal alternatives is what drives piracy.