There are all kinds of things that the law says to do that isn’t optimal. Sometimes the right thing to do isn’t ideological, but realistic and practical. I agree everyone should collectively slow down, not because its lawful but because it is safer. But until they do, I will always pick the safer option over what is lawful. Lawfulness is not a barometer of ethics, its a tool of power.

Nowhere in the article does it say that. Your ego is more important than your own life or the life of others, that tracks with both of your comments.

the core insight remains widely accepted in traffic engineering: deviation from the average traffic speed, especially on high-speed roads, is a significant risk factor.

Certainly it is safer if everyone everyone drives the speed limit, lowering the speed of traffic. But that’s not realistically what happens. I’m talking about when you are around other cars that are all going over the limit. The difference in speed between vehicles is also dangerous. When you drive slower than traffic you become a hazard and bottleneck that raises the danger of everyone near you. Better to be alive than “right”.

The title is clickbait, its really about difference in speed: https://seasia.co/2025/09/05/driving-slower-is-actually-more-dangerous-than-driving-fast

Challenge your assumptions.

The safest speed to go is the speed of traffic. If the limit is 55 and you are driving 52 but everyone else is driving 62, you are the most dangerous person on the road.

Is the link dead, or is it because I’m on their ban list?

English is one of 2 official languages there and Christianity is the primary religion.

My research in school was exactly this, I set out to prove people on social media lacked social connection irl. What I found out was the opposite, the more people were trying to connect online directly correlated to connecting more offline. Some people just seem to crave those connections anywhere they can get it.

I don’t disagree with anything you’re saying.

Here’s the thing that I think puts LeBron in tier 1 status, the 2016 Cavs pulled off the single hardest thing anyone has ever done in the history of the NBA. Come back from down 3-1 against a historically great Warriors team. MJ never did that. Kareem never did that. Even the greatest winner of all time Bill Russell.

But I will respond to this. Jordan didn’t need to come back 3-1 in the finals because he was never in that position in the finals. Russell come back down 3-1 against Wilt Chamberlain earlier in the playoffs, the first time it was ever done. Kareem only faced that situation when he was past his prime. Still damn impressive when lebron did it and I remember at the time thinking it was career defining. Lebron was definitely the most complete player in physicality and skillset, but he was the master of none.

The thing that always impressed me about Jordan and Curry was the sheer number of times they just completely took over a game and looked like an unstoppable force of nature. Too many times to count.

You probably know way more basketball history than me so i may be risking ridicule by challenging a few things.

Explanation: Lebron’s goat status is slightly over stated in a media desperation to keep the NBA hyped, IMO. Curry beat Lebron in 15 of their 22 games head to head in the finals. Lebron failed in championships way more often than not. Lebron never had that killer mentality of a tier 1. Opting to cry to refs and make any excuse for his failures. He still deserves top of tier 2, but that’s all. Also Sam Jones and Scotty pippin were extremely good players overshadowed by the greats on their teams, they belong somwhere on this list. Curry is always slightly underrated. He is undoubtedly the greatest shooter of all time, and became a good defender with excellent ball awareness after weak defense early in his career (which, IMO, plagued perception of him long after his defense was solid).

Flame my choices, I played ball, but I’m no historian.

Tier 1 - Jordan, Kareem, Russell

Tier 2 - Lebron, Wilt, Curry, Magic, Bird, Shaq, Kobe

Tier 3 - Sam Jones …

Tier 4 - … Pippen

Honestly not enough context here to answer. Are they a former close friend, distant aquintence, former love interest? Do you have a pattern of long period of time with no catch up? A lot of thing in relationships are contextual based on set expectations.

Solar is easily the cheapest energy and its getting cheaper every year. Repairing a coal power plant is not as attractive as a much cheaper to run biofuel plant. Etc.

Here in germany we have investors abandoning half build solar parks cause they aren’t profitable anymore.

Without knowing the specifics, I doubt profitability was the issue. Once a solar panel is installed it is pure profit with minimal maintenance. Companies get in trouble when they commit way more to a project than they can raise in investments. It seems more likely that is what happened.

Lastly your looking at a few countries that are pushing back with what amounts to theater (Germany is 56% renewable energy). Meanwhile the largest producer of energy in the world, China, is staying committed to converting to renewables and s also 56% of the way there. But even in countries pushing back the growth trend is clear, we are past early adoption and squarely in the common adoption phase of electrifying our technology out of fossil fuels.

Sure but the problem would be 100 times worse if fossil fuel adoption doest decline. Its good news that we seem to be on the way to shifting our behavior.

I’m concerned about climate change. But if you ask most people how much progress we’ve made they would say “barely any”. That belief that we can’t do it, is the main thing aside from public policy slowing us down. When people think things are hopeless, they often don’t see the point in fighting or changing their behavior. I also think most people don’t realize that renewable energy adoption has accelerated so quickly the last few years. Every year we have had massive growth over last year in adoption.

iirc ~1/4 of the worlds energy production is renewable. More than 90% of all new electricity capacity worldwide came from renewable sources in 2024. Doomers want you to believe it can’t happen again while we are in the very decade that is likely to change the world. Public policy doesn’t even matter at this point, renewable energy is cheaper, so nearly all new investments are in renewables.

There is a difference between ending colonialism and removing people from land. I find it absolutely crazy that people that have no issue with immigration anywhere else in the world think it is suddenly bad there. The issue isn’t with Jews simply existing in the middle east, its with Israel’s colonialism and genocide of Palestine. Isreal can stop existing without the genocide of the Jewish people. Removing all Jews is evil, just as removing all Palestinians is evil, they are both genocide.

The issue is one of power, colonialism, and Israel’s genocide. Those can change without causing another genocide.

Dude, I’m not your therapist. Please go talk to someone instead of taking it out on potential allies. You need to deal with your shit instead of completely decontextualizing what people say and seeing enemies everywhere. To be very clear, I think netenyahu is objectively an evil piece of shit and those that follow him are embroiled in his evil. But any human alive can be evil, its not unique to Israelis or Germans. Calling someone a Zionist because your too confused to follow the conversation is silly. Please go back to reddit and take your toxicity with you.

I think you lack reading comprehension. Reread both sentences and maybe don’t jump to conclusions before activating your brain and comprehending the full point.

Yes, of course, the Nazis controlled their populace with hate and fear, im failing to see why this is suddenly controversial.

More pointing out that its easy to look from the outside and wonder why people are so awful, but humans are easily controlled with fear.

When you live in constant war, its really easy to instill fear and foment hate. That’s why netenyahu keeps up the war machine, its his primary avenue to power.