We should call more AI slop photoshop.

Try setting Nextcloud up with https://coopcloud.tech/. Matter of minutes.

https://archive.is/ZgCza

Everyone is technically full of themselves.

Also, technically, people are regularly full of shit.

You oversaw how they grew themselves.

Except all over the world “the normal people” are voting fascists into power.

Is that something bots do?

Never heard of this practice. But it seems to be a thing yes.

Turns out it was Vonnegut again.

The scientific attempts to mitigate or suppress hailfalls began in the 1950s, a few years after Schaefer (1946) and Vonnegut (1947) discovered the means to increase the ice crystal concentration in clouds by using dry ice or silver iodide (AgI) particles, and consequently to interfere with the natural precipitation processes.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169809515003774

Sounds like a stupid thing to mess with? If only because you open up speculations like this?

You guys have a hail prevention system?

Why would AI companies respect noindex tags if they dont even care about copyright?

Thank you this was very helpful.

Ah ok, looks like I didn’t read the article carefully enough.

That still leaves two scenarios though:

1. Claude fucked up, and gave Google a way to index public links of people. After this news broke, they asked Google (and other search engines) to not show those urls anymore.
2. People fucked up and/or fell victim to Google’s the data hunger, which let Google to index their public links, after which Claude asked Google not to index such links.

I guess, in the end, I’m mostly wondering if the long random strings of public links are generally “brute-force-discovered” by crawlers like Google, or whether “discovery” of such links requires some kind of breach.

A bit like Hitler blaming the allies for failing to avoid the Holocaust.

You can still use it however you want. If you want to connect to others you can’t demand that they do as you please, though. Much like you wouldn’t want them to force you to do how they please.

Ha wow. I searched and I found this:

In Southern Europe they are realising that wildfires have been raging through areas that were once grazed but have since been abandoned by an ageing population no longer content to be peasant farmers.

Formerly it was an offence in many countries for landowners not to maintain fire breaks by spraying. Now, under pressure from Greens, the rules have been relaxed in many areas, and chickens are coming home to roost with their wings on fire.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/08/05/rewilding-making-wildfires-worse/

For example: Vlaams Belang (far-right in Belgium) is all indignant about how the country supposedly spent too much on climate mitigation (something they have always fought) and not enough on climate adaptation.

See for example this piece on their website about the forest fires, titled: “forget about the climate church, start investing in climate adaptation”.

But then how do they make money out of it?

With the money that it costs to send an entire data center to space you can easily fortify and militarize your data center on earth to the extent that no protester will ever come close?

The law is anyway already largely under their control right? They don’t have to go to space to evade the law.

And to the extent that the law still applies to them and constraints then, doesn’t it also still apply to the necessary ground-based necessities for space based data centers? As in, if the state wants to shut them down, they can still do so?

You can shoot it down…