If you’re going to die because you can’t afford it, then does the risk really matter?
If you’re going to die because you can’t afford it, then does the risk really matter?
Believe me it’s as pathetic as it sounds.
Easiest way to get laughed out of the courtroom when you attempt to use it as a legal defense.
You used a VPN… Right?
Not too hard to achieve after seeing how dead set Musk is on killing Twitter…
Nothing a VPN can’t solve
If we’re lucky he’ll piss off his Russian contacts and end up falling out a window by accident.
More likely is that this puppet will be used by bad actors to advance their agendas and as usual he’ll distract everybody from the actual bad shit happening.
I like to use the Wirecutter from the New York Times as a starting point, though I often ignore the products recommended because the links are typically to American online retailers that I’m unlikely to use. I pay more attention to the various aspects used to recommend their choices, then check other reviews from specialized hobbyist forums when available. Finally, if I find the product in a store I will ask to demo it before buying.
YouTube can be helpful if you can cut through the clutter or need to see head to head testing between your short list items. Don’t blindly search there though because the algorithm is shit.
It’s simply part of an effort to impose moral beliefs on a world that to them, appears to work without them. Bringing order to chaos. Kind of like the Christian beliefs underpinning such cruelty.
This issue has been explored previously, and with a better example of the trolley problem that centers the ethical dilemma entirely on the autopilot.
I do agree that in most situations, the driver retains full control over the vehicle, and therefore remains fully responsible, even if there’s a case to be made that the autopilot neglected the safety of others outside the car.
However, I’d also argue that this example leaves a possibility where fault cannot be assigned to them: If the driver became aware of the hazards at a reasonable time (i.e. spotting the pedestrians just around a sharp bend, rather than 200m down a straightaway), and made every reasonable effort to stop within that time but could not. There are limits to the driver’s responsibility, but the most interesting cases are crashes that the autopilot is capable of preventing (even if the driver reasonably cannot), but fails to do so.
Bro, is this really the time for that 💀
They can also prevent you from losing your job unfairly, and fight for wage increases and benefits that you otherwise wouldn’t get.