![](https://suppo.fi/pictrs/image/521fbec0-5dec-4e32-bb30-dfee90820a09.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/q98XK4sKtw.png)
It can’t be removed. That info comes straight from the hardware itself (UEFI and individual devices).
It can’t be removed. That info comes straight from the hardware itself (UEFI and individual devices).
This didn’t seem to occur in Windows, but I’m pretty sure the copy process was also slower so guessing it’s some sort of buffer or heat quirk that 'nix didn’t account for in the more generic driver
If the device says it’s a generic storage device (to the system that is) but actually isn’t (based on your description) then it’s 100% devices fault and not a Linux fault.
This command won’t show the real values when using btrfs. You need to use sudo btrfs filesystem usage /
.
So my TLDR, is that its possible to be a USER without touching the terminal, but I dont think its possible to be an administrator without.
Suse with Yast makes it possible to administer just with GUI. Not 100% sure if it can do absolutely everything possible but it has lots of tools.
Just use some other search engine. No tricks needed to get non ai bs results.
Have an idea which might solve this.
When the host routing table is like this:
$route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
default 192.168.102.1 0.0.0.0 UG 600 0 0 wlp19s0f4u1u1
default RT-AC86U-6D60 0.0.0.0 UG 20100 0 0 enp15s0
the VM has internet connection. If the defaults are the other way around it doesn’t.
This sounds reasonable. Curiously now that I tried again with both host lan & wlan active there was no problem. I have a hunch the routing depends on which interface networkmanger starts first.
$route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
default 192.168.102.1 0.0.0.0 UG 600 0 0 wlp19s0f4u1u1
default RT-AC86U-6D60 0.0.0.0 UG 20100 0 0 enp15s0
192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 100 0 0 enp15s0
192.168.100.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 virbr1
192.168.102.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 600 0 0 wlp19s0f4u1u1
192.168.122.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 virbr0_
Here’s the final peer reviewed version https://peerj.com/articles/cs-111/.
They didn’t use very comprehensive research methods. Also they only used Github.
First, from the GHTorrent data set, we extract the email addresses of GitHub users. Second, for each email address, we use the search engine in the Google+ social network to search for users with that email address. Third, we parse the returned users’ ‘About’ page to scrape their gender.
a bias against men exists, that is, a form of reverse discrimination.
How is it reverse discrimination. It’s still plain old discrimination. I’m starting to smell a biased research here. Or at least the researchers have a bias.
This research isn’t peer reviewed so I wouldn’t take it at face value just yet.
Here’s a good list: https://github.com/morrownr/USB-WiFi/blob/main/home/USB_WiFi_Adapters_that_are_supported_with_Linux_in-kernel_drivers.md