The ram kit I bought sometime last year for 140 is now nearly 1000. If I wasn’t constantly using it I’d sell ot
The ram kit I bought sometime last year for 140 is now nearly 1000. If I wasn’t constantly using it I’d sell ot


Why can’t you?


You can rent cars below 25 they just cost extra.


What’s the average age of a military pilot


Ml will say china has 7(?) independent parties that are totally not fully controlled opposition


Noz horrible campaigning and racists got us trump


Local vs amazon are not the only 2 options. And let me be very clear. I am not simply saying “Buy local”. Conflating that with ethical shopping is wrong.


“only” is the keyword in the title. Also, no, most utilities are pay for how much you use, not subscription models.


If we’re going to have missiles, knife missiles are a good thing


People have no morals. Most people only care about the cheapest price, and after that getting the best item for the cheapest price
You are aware that percentages of demographics changing does not demonstrate a shrinking user base by itself, yes?


Most people. The vast majority of people. Because most people aren’t that “paranoid”(if you can call it that when the threat is real)


Private companies should be allowed to build their own infrastructure or rent public infrastructure. But they shouldn’t be allowed to purchase public infrastructure. Imo


Be nice if Chicago had the same attitude towards our highways ):


That’s because Cannabis is not a substance with a strong chemical addiction. There has been a significant increase in cannabis usage. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/ss/ss6511a1.htm
Strictly, Cannabis isn’t really any worse than alcohol.
Heroin is far worse. Drugs are addictive, and when available legally it will encourage more people to try them.
Do you say that after running a stop sign in a school zone and killing a child?


Tell that to those who think trump would save Gaza


Freely available heroin is not a good thing. Drug addiction would get significantly worse. Decriminalize possession, criminalize distribution. That’s a more balanced approach
There’s more than some hypocrisy. Taking money that should be going to taxes and spending it on charity and pretending they’re some massive do gooder is not a good thing.