Bootlickers always do

At this point I’m more concerned about the American election results, which could result in an authoritarian regime…

Well, largely we don’t expect politicians to keep promises…

It is? Fucking wow (ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻

Calling it now.

They’ll say it’s a conspiracy and Biden is running things behind the scenes as head of the deep state, Kamala is just a puppet

He’s gonna be the forever bogeyman.

To biden: Just do it. They were always going to accuse you. They’ll charge you when you lose. Just actually do it.

The answer is always, the service will sick until you leave for another company.

Then you’ll find out sucks just as much there, cause you have to buy from someone

In fact, without the pier they still would have executed the operation. Pier was convenient, but not necessary

There’s absolutely no way they’d have allowed it’s construction of it wasn’t necessary for them. We can tell because it’s already being dismantled

This right here is the correct answer.

The pier was necessary for Israeli ops tho

The answer is sexism. Before anything else, women were whores.

Not cool actually. It’s clearly not true, but that’s why it’s a saying.

Regressives want the personal freedom to harass hurt and kill who they want. That’s what they’re talking about. They feel the walls finally around them saying they can’t. So they lash out, at anything.

They are dangerous feral animals

Always were

Time to scrape notes data for ai

The example of the mobile phone is pretty wrong. The first mobile cost about $4000 and the cheapest today still costs around $25. The original cars cost 30k adjusted for inflation with the cheapest today costing around 15.

Once again. It’s always held true. Outside factors could make it take longer but ultimately you said never. Which basically makes your original statement near impossible.

Logically the refutation is kind of easy. Your prediction hinges on two things. A predicate that technology will never get better or cheaper.

Both of those things happen all the time as such, the refutation is simple.

Points to our entire technological history

You’re allowed to take videos in public, yes. but someone can’t then steal that video and use it for just any purpose.

There’s a clear distinction

The other side of the story meets its inevitable conclusion too.

Least the bear only killed her. /s

View is not the same as “use in a commercial enterprise to turn a profit”. Only a fool would think that’s the same thing.