

I agree, but what’s really weird for me is this part:
he wouldn’t say whether a firearm has been recovered from the fire-damaged residence
Yet the autopsies show that they were all shot. I imagine that the autopsies also show that he was the one to do it based on time of death, but odd that the article doesn’t present that evidence.







Does this mean my first review has to be a 3+ star one or does it only start after, say 5 reviews? I’m okay with either tbh