The headline says they killed a military target, but the body you copied only mentions civilians. Israel will always spin their terrorist attacks as of military usefulness and should be completely ignored.
The headline says they killed a military target, but the body you copied only mentions civilians. Israel will always spin their terrorist attacks as of military usefulness and should be completely ignored.
So you’re actually fully in support of terrorism. Factoring in “Scaring the shit out of” in a military action is what terrorism is.
The USA is trying to start a war with Iran and Lebanon, and Israel is their instrument.
It’s insane that there’s even entertaining that it isn’t.
Gets called a racist, immediately starts using slurs.
Out of the 11 countries that recognise Taiwan, 4 appear in this list. Paraguay, Palau, Nauru and Tuvalu. I think it’s fairly plausible that some of these 14 countries did not willingly vote against.
Wasn’t mBridge meant to satisfy that?
I don’t know. The article quotes the Russian ambassador saying it needs to integrate with the banks and whatever systems are in place currently for each country, but that doesn’t necessarily mean SWIFT as well. But even if it’s a direct competitor, the possibility of future SWIFT integration has to be considered. I’d be surprised if they blanket never wanted it to happen.
The article doesn’t make it clear if they’re talking about something for people or just institutions.
You say that, but they have to get it right first go, and it’s also the question of how it’ll interact with SWIFT.
Sure, so swap it out with something that costs more than 3K.
It stops you from spending your money anonymously. Why is it the state’s business if you want to buy a hijab? Fine, they’re illegal to wear outside, but if it’s legal to wear inside I should be allowed to own one without scrutiny. But I also don’t trust the regime that outlawed them in the first place to let me do that.
A complete excision of all overlap with USA culture.
Why did you name your instance .world?! 😭
Okay so you created a meme where you made someone say a popular opinion you disagree with. Then you made someone rebuttal with “You aren’t human” and the subject replying with “You got me”. What is the joke exactly? How should that be interpreted? Because I interpret it as “People who disagree with me aren’t humans”. Do you not see how that is both unfunny and offensive?
Democracy is when you can decide what your country does right? Like while the government is currently in power and stuff?
Perhaps there’s a benefit to letting Israel lie so the lies can be documented.
They signed a treaty so are beholdent to the terms of the treaty.
Is Ukrainetoday.co.uk affiliated with the state of Ukraine?