I don’t remember what caused the Voat’s origin, except it involved Reddit HQ. And then it went under in 2020.

What’s different about this time and with Lemmy to make it a feasible alternative to Reddit? Is it random chance?

  • lynny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Voat died because they took a max free speech approach, even allowing racism and stuff. Lemmy does not have a central administration that can make decisions like that, as each instance gets to decide if they federate with another instance or not.

    There’s no doubt going to be a banlist that gets shared amongst the biggest, most popular instances to get rid of the trolls.

    • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      It wasn’t “even allowing racism and stuff”. It was created pretty much solely to be a safe space for assholes.

      Turns out that doesn’t keep the lights running.

    • lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Voat was also competing with reddit during a period of growth by appealing to the more toxic elements of the communities. There wasn’t enough of them to sustain an entire service and remain solvent, and they didn’t bring anything new to the experience. It was just a reddit clone.

      The big difference now is that reddit corp has decided to alienate a severe chunk of their userbase.

      I also suspect there were a lot of people who wanted to be part of certain communities, but weren’t thrilled with the reddit format. There just wasn’t anything else.

      Those users are now open to alternatives like Lemmy, or Discord or another federated service. Reminds me of IRC in the 90s. If you got bored of efnet, connect to another network.

    • Y|yukichigai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Voat died because they took a max free speech approach, even allowing racism and stuff.

      It cannot be stressed enough how core this was to Voat’s identity, and also how much it poisoned the entire platform. When even objecting to bigotry is against the ethos of the site then there’s no way to build a healthy community, much less an inclusive one.

      Also if anyone is curious how much of a cesspool Voat became, here’s the most “upvoated” for the month just six months before the site shut down. Warning: lots of bigotry.

  • goat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Most definitely!

    I was one of the first users on voat and one of the first banned users on voat. It had horrible admins who were way out of their depth and a posting system that could be exploited. If your account reaches a certain amount of downvotes, it is automatically locked, meaning that bands of users travel from profile-to-profile, destroying any other profiles they dislike.

    also, the lack of diversity killed Voat, having nothing but Neo-Nazi and extremist content. This is still a problem that Lemmy faces, where instead of dealing with disagreeable speech, it’s easier to defederate whole instances.