Introducing Lumo: AI where every conversation is confidential | Proton
proton.me
Lumo gives you the power to solve problems big and small, while keeping your personal data confidential. Try it now.

We believe the benefits of AI are too great to miss, and the risks too serious to ignore. Whether we like it or not, AI is here to stay, but the current iterations of AI reflect a failure to learn from the past. That’s why we built Lumo — a private AI assistant that only works for you, not the other way around. With no logs kept and every chat encrypted, Lumo keeps your conversations confidential and your data fully under your control — never shared, sold, or stolen.

You can start using Lumo today for free, even if you don’t have a Proton Account. Just go to lumo.proton.me and type in a query.

            • bcovertigo@lemmy.worldEnglish
              7·
              16 days ago

              I love thinking, I just don’t think the conceit if this article is worth following.

              Redditors pointed this out and piled criticism on Andy & Proton, calling them ignorant and saying that they are cherry-picking facts to fit their narrative, which is a fair criticism, given that the Trump administration is known to be unfair, manipulative, and liars. But, if we are to be fair, it is worth checking whether or not Andy’s point has any ground to stand on. While it seems hard to believe that Trump would crack down on Big Tech, my research indicates Andy is actually just stating a fact.

              If I think trump and vance are liars who just stick/carrot big tech as desired when it benefits them how does this article change anything? I appreciate that the writer tries to address this but they just… failed to change my mind. They gave nothing of substance that would recontextualize what I’ve seen or refute it.

              It’s a little rude to claim what the writer themselves call “fair criticism” as unthinking. Can you really not see how people would keep the opinion on top of the nagging feeling that this is likely just another tech company sucking orange dick then trying to weasel out of consequences?

              Fire is good in a fireplace, and bad on your body. I can recognize a gun as a tool and also freak out when it’s pointed at my face. AI is a tool being used real fucking poorly from a societal standpoint so it gets no slack from me, and we need better than liars to set it straight if it doesn’t hollow our economies out first. I’m not trying to convince you but hopefully this at least outlined a coherent train of thought and you can understand it now.

                • JumpyWombat@lemmy.ml
                  3·
                  16 days ago

                  Internet is full of zealots whose life mission is fixing what contradicts their reality.

                  It’s fun sometimes to interact with them, but usually moving on is the right thing to do. Life is too short to “be right” online.

      • Echedelle (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        32·
        16 days ago

        As a public person, he could just state the obvious if so.

        Like with politicians in a lot of countries, their lifes [CEOs like him] are public and so must be for him, in order to ensure a minimun transparency.

        If he really sees it in that way, he could just state it, yet he picks support as those who do what is convenient.

        A lot of liberals follow trump, and not necessarily agree in everything with him. Just like a lot of people in germany supports Afd as they think it will improve the economy.

        Yet all this is shit itself. The lack of universal ethics in those actions.

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        25·
        16 days ago

        ha, right! one employee says one thing and thats the end for the entire company??

        stupid. and the idea that the whole conversation is tainted because ‘conceit’ is also kinda hilarious