• Genius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I can see them with my own eyes right now. And the dress is black and blue, so I’m right. You just can’t see them, but don’t mistake your eyesight problems for objective truth.

        • Genius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          In the larger version of the picture, you can see three areas of glare on the right. One from the window, one from the top of the table, and one from the floor. The backs of the items closer to the door, and the edge of the table, are darker than these glare areas. There’s also a bright spot on the left. If you have good spatial intelligence, you can clearly tell the glare is coming from the sun based on how the light falls in the room.

          • auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            The College of Optometrists came out and said it was ambigious. It’s the point of the image dumbass. It’s not about good spatial awareness. All you’re demonstrating is lack of basic perception.

            • Genius@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Ah yes, I lack perception because I can see more things than you do, and they lead me to correct conclusions about the state of the world. That makes complete sense.

              And Usain Bolt runs so fast because he has weak legs, obviously.

              • auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                You lack perception because your level of understanding is childish. I’d put you at 7/8. It’s really quite illuminating how thick some people can be.

                • Genius@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Most insults aren’t the same thing as an ad hominem fallacy. An insult is only an ad hominem when it’s the entire substance of one’s argument. Like you’re doing right now, shit-for-brains.