It’s not relevant to the point being criticized, since the insane shit being criticized is “It’s okay to deport millions of Israeli Jews because they have Bad Ancestors” not “There should be a single nondiscriminatory state for all residents of the region instead of Israel”
OOP started out with this comment, after all:
When the Council of Rabbis falls and the population of enslaved Zionists is liberated and allowed to return to their native countries, Iran will be greated as a liberator.
Saying that Iran has the same right to defend itself as Israel hardly strikes me as tongue-in-cheek. Nor does doubling-down talking about how Israel-born Israelis ‘belonging’ in the countries of their European ancestors despite such rhetoric having no such usage it could be mirrored from regarding current rhetoric in a potential war with Iran.
It’s not relevant to the point being criticized, since the insane shit being criticized is “It’s okay to deport millions of Israeli Jews because they have Bad Ancestors” not “There should be a single nondiscriminatory state for all residents of the region instead of Israel”
OOP started out with this comment, after all:
You forgot this part -
That comment was tongue-in-cheek.
Saying that Iran has the same right to defend itself as Israel hardly strikes me as tongue-in-cheek. Nor does doubling-down talking about how Israel-born Israelis ‘belonging’ in the countries of their European ancestors despite such rhetoric having no such usage it could be mirrored from regarding current rhetoric in a potential war with Iran.
Here maybe this will help: