• MangoCats@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    There’s also the idea of crashing a metallic asteroid somewhere convenient, like the Outback.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m envisioning extracting more copper and other metals that would be utilized in space, so - yeah, if you can develop smelting and refinement capabilities on-orbit there’s some attractiveness there, but down on the mud-ball we’re going to use over a million times as much material as we are currently utilizing on orbit and beyond, so getting that material down is going to be a whole lot cheaper and more efficient as a “natural skyfall” than any kind of controlled re-entry.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, that ain’t happening for the next 50 years. The amount of logistics and technology required for that is beyond immense, never mind risks

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Well, I suspect we’ve got enough copper for the next 50 years, so… good timing.

        And, you don’t start with a Manhattan sized rock, you practice with little ones just big enough to survive re-entry and work your way up. The key is learning to operate long term with “rock moving tech” in solar orbit. We’re not there, which is why we should have started 50 years ago…