goat@sh.itjust.worksM to MeanwhileOnGrad@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 年前Tankies take a moment to engage in some North Korea propaganda. 'North Korea is a democracy'sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square204fedilinkarrow-up1335arrow-down118file-text
arrow-up1317arrow-down1imageTankies take a moment to engage in some North Korea propaganda. 'North Korea is a democracy'sh.itjust.worksgoat@sh.itjust.worksM to MeanwhileOnGrad@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 年前message-square204fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaregoat@sh.itjust.worksOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·1 年前So if you know your argument is semantic, why are you even arguing it to begin with?
minus-squareCommunist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 年前semantics /sĭ-măn′tĭks/ noun The study or science of meaning in language. It does not mean “pointless things that shouldn’t be argued”
minus-squaregoat@sh.itjust.worksOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 年前Can you send this definition to the above user as well?
minus-squaregoat@sh.itjust.worksOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 年前Oh, I’ll do it for you. So we get into a bit of a semantic dilemma here. semantics /sĭ-măn′tĭks/ noun The study or science of meaning in language.
minus-squareCommunist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 年前There was no need because they used the word properly.
minus-squareLibertyLizard@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 年前Because semantics are an important element of this discussion? I don’t understand the question.
So if you know your argument is semantic, why are you even arguing it to begin with?
semantics /sĭ-măn′tĭks/
noun
The study or science of meaning in language.
It does not mean “pointless things that shouldn’t be argued”
Can you send this definition to the above user as well?
No need.
Oh, I’ll do it for you.
semantics /sĭ-măn′tĭks/
noun
The study or science of meaning in language.
There was no need because they used the word properly.
perhaps you can too
Because semantics are an important element of this discussion? I don’t understand the question.