Archived version

Hackathons are common, but Chinese hacking competitions are different.

In 2017, Zhou Hongyi, the founder of Chinese cybersecurity giant Qihoo 360, publicly criticised the practice of sharing vulnerability discoveries internationally, arguing that such strategic assets should stay within China. His sentiments, supported by the Chinese government, gave birth to the national hacking competition called the Tianfu Cup. The contest is focused on discovering vulnerabilities in global tech products like Apple iOS, Google’s Android, and Microsoft systems.

How is Tianfu Cup different?

A 2018 rule mandates participants of the Tianfu Cup to hand over their findings to the government, instead of the tech companies.

Dakota Cary, a China-focused consultant at the US cybersecurity company SentinelOne, said, “In practice, this meant vulnerabilities were passed to the state for use in operations.”

This approach effectively turned hacking competitions into a government pipeline for acquiring zero-day vulnerabilities — software flaws unknown to vendors and extremely valuable for cyber-espionage.

In recent years, China’s hacking competitions have increasingly shifted focus toward breaching domestic products, including Chinese-made electric vehicles, phones, and security software.

  • xrun_detected@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Thanks for your reply, it made some good points. It however didn’t need the part starting with “It however…” as phrases like this simply devalue everything that was written before them, and are usually followed by a change of topic.

    The topic was the question if deploying trojans in another country’s infrastructure counts as an “ABSOLUTELY defensive” measure.

    It is in fact bad no matter what state does it.

    This could have been a perfect sentence to finish with, don’t you think? ;)