cm0002@lemmy.worldcake to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前AI models routinely lie when honesty conflicts with their goalswww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square117fedilinkarrow-up1596arrow-down126
arrow-up1570arrow-down1external-linkAI models routinely lie when honesty conflicts with their goalswww.theregister.comcm0002@lemmy.worldcake to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square117fedilink
minus-squarethedruid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down6·1 年前No, the task was To tell me the difference in the two modes. It provided incorrect information and passed it off as accurate. It didn’t complete the task You know that though. You’re just too invested to admit it. So I will withdraw. Enjoy your day.
minus-squareFreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 年前It completed the task, it was just wrong.
minus-squarethedruid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·1 年前No. It gave the wrong answer therefore it didn’t complete the task. It gave the wrong answer. Task incomplete That’s literally how a task works.
minus-squareChozo@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 年前Bruh. The task was to mislead. That’s what it did.
minus-squarethedruid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前That’s not the task I mentioned. I asked what the difference between two modes is. It was wrong. It was confidently wrong. I
minus-squareChozo@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 年前Are you talking about the hypothetical scenario you made up about the subject you don’t even understand? No wonder we’re going in circles. I’m talking about the article.
minus-squarethedruid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 年前Did you go to trump university? You responded to MY comments which were clear. Stop moving goal posts ,making assumptions, and resorting to name-calling g it’s a sign of stupidity, that I am not ready to truly apply to you, yet Now. Good evening.
minus-squareChozo@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 年前Nobody called you anything, dude. Are we having different conversations or something?
minus-squareFreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前The task was to tell you the difference. It told you the difference, it was just wrong about the differences. Giving an incorrect answer to a task is still doing the task.
minus-squarethedruid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前I swear. The mental gymnastics If I tell you to take the garbage out, then you throw it through the window , that isn’t molesting the task. Anymore than this does 1+1 is 2. Don’t freaking force crap to fit into that “feature, not a bug” bullshit. It’s the issue we have with products in general. Excuses instead of results. Welcome to the world of a. I support
minus-squareFreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前So if you answer a question wrong on a test you didn’t complete the test?
minus-squarethedruid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前No. You didn’t. you completed the percentage of the test that you answered correctly. Well supposedly. Bottom line. A. I. isn’t ready at all. Especially if one has to argue to make it’s failures seem like a success
No, the task was To tell me the difference in the two modes.
It provided incorrect information and passed it off as accurate. It didn’t complete the task
You know that though. You’re just too invested to admit it. So I will withdraw. Enjoy your day.
It completed the task, it was just wrong.
No. It gave the wrong answer therefore it didn’t complete the task. It gave the wrong answer. Task incomplete
That’s literally how a task works.
Bruh. The task was to mislead. That’s what it did.
That’s not the task I mentioned.
I asked what the difference between two modes is. It was wrong. It was confidently wrong.
I
Are you talking about the hypothetical scenario you made up about the subject you don’t even understand? No wonder we’re going in circles.
I’m talking about the article.
Did you go to trump university? You responded to MY comments which were clear.
Stop moving goal posts ,making assumptions, and resorting to name-calling g it’s a sign of stupidity, that I am not ready to truly apply to you, yet
Now. Good evening.
Nobody called you anything, dude. Are we having different conversations or something?
The task was to tell you the difference. It told you the difference, it was just wrong about the differences. Giving an incorrect answer to a task is still doing the task.
I swear. The mental gymnastics
If I tell you to take the garbage out, then you throw it through the window , that isn’t molesting the task. Anymore than this does
1+1 is 2. Don’t freaking force crap to fit into that “feature, not a bug” bullshit. It’s the issue we have with products in general.
Excuses instead of results. Welcome to the world of a. I support
So if you answer a question wrong on a test you didn’t complete the test?
No. You didn’t. you completed the percentage of the test that you answered correctly. Well supposedly.
Bottom line. A. I. isn’t ready at all. Especially if one has to argue to make it’s failures seem like a success