• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    It’s always weird to see when courts go so much against everyone (even the prosecutors?) so they can kill someone. The bloodlust…

    • RidderSport@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s bloody expensive to grant an appeal - hence the hesitation, especially since SCOTUS is not actually ruling law anymore

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Every year about 8,000 people file their cases for cert at the Supreme Court. Each year they grant cert on about 80. Roughly 1/1000 odds. Those about 8,000 cases include cases that have also previously filed in past years without cert.

      Amicus briefs are not uncommon. They often don’t grant cert when there are no novel legal questions. The Supreme Court simply doesn’t not have the ability to hear every appeal. Them not granting cert in any case should not be taken as a dispositive.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Well good to know. I thought they had to choose to take up a case to reject it, but it makes sense that they would be and to reject it outright without having to hear it.