• Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Good, this should have always been the norm. You literally cannot predict disaster, so you should always have something available just in case.

    It should also include things like jugs of non-potable water in addition to jugs of potable water. The non-potable water can be used for things like flushing toilets a commonly overlooked but important aspect of losing water access.

    • sensiblepuffin@lemmy.funami.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      If you have a bathtub, an easy way is just to fill that and use it for flushing the toilet. I think my family did that for a week after Katrina.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Unfortunately, not really. I only thought of this one due to how many times I’ve had to deal with not having water and needing to flush my poos ha.

      • moody@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s not that it specifically needs to be non-potable, just that you shouldn’t waste drinking/cooking to wash yourself and flush toilets when you don’t know how long issues can last.

        Rain water and eavestrough runoff water is fine for flushing and cleaning, and it doesn’t need to be kept in food-safe containers.

        • blakenong@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 days ago

          Oh I see, collect it when you can, because a surplus of water is better than just having water for drinking. This makes sense. I think people often forget how much water we use on a daily basis.

          • moody@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 days ago

            Basically, yeah. You can also water your plants with stuff that you wouldn’t drink too, instead of letting them die because of an emergency happening.

        • TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Though that begs the question if it isn’t wasteful to save non-potable water when you could save potable water instead.

          • qarbone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            A person could have containers they wouldn’t drink out of but can hold liquid just fine.

  • einkorn@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 days ago

    Rookie numbers. The Bundes­amt für Bevölkerungs­schutz und Katastrophen­hilfe recommends to have supplies for two weeks on hand.

    In totally unrelated news: Two weeks is also the projected timeframe it would take for a civil war like state to emerge if order can’t be established after a country wide emergency.

  • Coreidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    72 hours? I haven’t even left my house for the last two weeks simply because I’m lazy and don’t like shopping every day.