• L3s@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 小时前

    Yes, I’m saving time. As I mentioned in my other comment:

    Yeah, normally my “Make this sound better” or “summarize this for me” is a longer wall of text that I want to simplify, I was trying to keep my examples short.

    And

    and helps correct my shitty grammar at times.

    And

    Hallucinations are a thing, so validating what it spits out is definitely needed.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      20 小时前

      How do you validate the accuracy of what it spits out?

      Why don’t you skip the AI and just use the thing you use to validate the AI output?

      • L3s@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        19 小时前

        Most of what I’m asking it are things I have a general idea of, and AI has the capability of making short explanations of complex things. So typically it’s easy to spot a hallucination, but the pieces that I don’t already know are easy to Google to verify.

        Basically I can get a shorter response to get the same outcome, and validate those small pieces which saves a lot of time (I no longer have to read a 100 page white paper, instead a few paragraphs and then verify small bits)