• GooberEar@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    In my industry, there’s a saying along the lines of “Good, fast, cheap. Pick two.”

    I think the fast food industry version is “Good, fast, cheap? No, no. And believe it or not, also no.”

    I don’t eat fast food very often, so this is entirely anecdotal. Of the fast food chains I’ve eaten at in recent history, Taco Bell is by far the worst. Against my better judgment, I even broke down and gave them a second chance at a different location thinking maybe my first terrible experience was a fluke. Didn’t work out. Makes me think it’s bad everywhere. Wendy’s has held up the best of the places I’ve eaten. It’s definitely not cheap anymore, fast depends on the location as well as other factors, and good is relative, but overall it hasn’t gone down hill as bad as the others.

    • renzev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This sums up my experience as well. It’s never been healthy, but at least it used to be cheap and tasty. But nowadays mcdonalds is so expensive I almost consider it a luxury, and the plastic-looking sauces and mystery meat are in no way appetizing (tho that might just be me getting older and changing preferences as opposed to the actual food getting worse)

    • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      taco bell definitely has one of the widest ranges in quality. one near my house is fucking awful and never gets the substitutions right, but the one 20 minutes away is great

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        To me it’s McDonalds, how something using the exact same ingredients and prep can taste so different and have vastly different delivery times in everyone you go to boggles the mind