• AngryRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Every fucking Chinese company is required to be an arm of their government and provide them with any information they request. It’s not even a question, they are an arm of the Chinese government. They can get fucked

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Same goes for US companies.

      Have we learned nothing from Snowden?

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Yeah it is similar, but not the same (at least not yet).

        China is a one-party state, and the government has control over private enterprise. If you are a Chinese company, the PRC ultimately has control of it, and that means the Chinese military has access to anything you have access to, if they want it.

        This is on a different level than anything Snowden released.

        • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          9 hours ago

          This is on a different level than anything Snowden released.

          Snowden released the fact that the major internet companies in the US literally have full time CIA staff and locked rooms with servers

          Why is this on a different level? Is it because they’re ASIANS?

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            That Snowden releasing the facts and it being brought up in courts, state congress, and federal congress as well as national news all revolved around it being illegal in the USA.

            In the PRC it’s only illegal to talk about it.

            • Bilb!@lem.monster
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              6 hours ago

              That Snowden releasing the facts and it being brought up in courts, state congress, and federal congress as well as national news all revolved around it being illegal in the USA.

              Did it stop?

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 hours ago

                The specific program Snowden revealed supposedly ended in 2015, it collected information such as who was calling who and for how long. The 9th Circuit actually ruled it clearly illegal in 2020 and Snowden made a Tweet about it in a relatively good mood.

          • CharmOffensive@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 hours ago

            The long and short of it is even leftie Americans have internalised American exceptionalism, even if they aren’t cognisant of it. And the right are, well… Racist and don’t want to admit it.

          • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            One government is actively committing genocide against subsets of their population I’d say it’s a pretty big fucking difference.

            • holo@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Yeah the US genocide of black Americans needs the earn them some serious sanctions, but it’s not relevant to this discussion.

        • holo@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          5 hours ago

          There are several hundred political parties in China currently in office.

        • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          China is a one-party state

          I wish you could realise how hilarious it is to read someone comparing the US and China on their number of political parties…

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Oh? So you are saying that there are no functional difference between a federation of 50 states, each with individual (somewhat independent) local and state governments, and the authoritarian CCP?

            When I say “China is a one-party state,” I’m not referring to political parties as we would understand them in the US (Democrat/Republican). I am referring to the actual structure of the government.

            You might want to maybe educate yourself on what a “one-party state” means in this context before trying to make snarky comments.

            • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              You’re right, I’m sorry, I really should educate myself about the US beyond the 40+ years of propaganda I’ve had to endure and the absolutely constant, never ending stream of shit across all media I’m the grateful recipient of, thanks to the Internet™. But honestly, I’m kinda scared I’d actually die if I came to visit.

              Meanwhile, my experience with China over the last ten years or so has left me regularly wondering, in the grand scheme of things, what the fucking difference is. You both are absolutely insane, from where I live.

              But yes, I was totally cherry picking your message. I don’t disagree with you, to be clear. I’m just amused about your choice of epithet.

            • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I’m being slightly disingenuous by focusing on one expression in the entire message, granted.
              But honestly, using “one party state” as an epiteth, like that’s what you want to focus on that’s badwrong about China? that’s amusing to me, reading this from Europe. YMMV.