• potustheplant@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It is pretty flexible. But ethernet, displayport, 3.5mm, etc require an adapter. Plus, usb-c’s bandwidth is typically 40gbps max, whereas DisplayPort is 80gbps, for example. Not to mention that the number of ports is way lower than it used to be.

      • potustheplant@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 minutes ago

        My point was that you require a physical adapter. You can’t plug in an RJ45 into a USB-C port.

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The Apples of this generation pictured all support DisplayPort alt mode, and Thunderbolt 3, through those USB-C ports. That means that you could use passive USB-C to DP cables that didn’t need active translation in the cable/adapter itself.

      • potustheplant@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 minutes ago

        That means that you could use passive USB-C to DP cable

        Precisely, you need to use an adapter and you’re already down a significant % of ports just plugging in a monitor. The ports in lots of laptop models are a joke and it’s baffling that more people aren’t laughing.