Wisconsin voters pass constitutional amendment explicitly barring noncitizens from voting
www.cbsnews.com
Wisconsin voters have passed a constitutional amendment that explicitly bars noncitizens from voting.

Article III Section 1 of the Wisconsin Constitution currently reads, “Every United States citizen age 18 or older who is a resident of an election district in this state is a qualified elector of that district.”

After Tuesday’s vote, the article will now read, “Only a United States citizen age 18 or older who is a resident of an election district in this state is a qualified elector of that district.”

Doesn’t this change the meaning of the statement so much that it’s no longer true that every citizen of age who is a resident is eligible to vote? Can this new language be interpreted by courts and lawmakers such that anyone can be disenfranchised if such malicious laws can be passed in the state?

  • Typotyper@sh.itjust.works
    151·
    2 days ago

    Does this also block US citizens living abroad because by definition they don’t reside in the electoral district.
    I added the bold highlight to the text from the article.

    Here’s the exact wording of the yes/no question:

    “Eligibility to vote. Shall section 1 of article III of the constitution, which deals with suffrage, be amended to provide that only a United States citizen age 18 or older who resides in an election district may vote in an election for national, state, or local office or at a statewide or local referendum?”

    • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
      11·
      1 day ago

      It would seem to do that, yes. You don’t even have to be abroad, as you could easily be stationed in a different state from your “home” residence.

      This has no effect on federal elections of course, and so I think it’s not that unreasonable to say that you only get to vote on local issues if you are living locally.