They have verifiable sources and are an international group of interdisciplinary scientists but their conclusions don’t mean that your subjective experiences aren’t real. Still, they are anecdotal, which is why I wanted to provide another source of information for people reading this thread.
I cannot trust “furscience” to be impartial.
god forbid i trust climate scientists to tell me whether climate change is happening.
Climate science doesn’t come from a single source. I don’t see this furry science being referenced outside of furry science.
god forbid a chemistry major doesn’t peer review my sociological paper written on the furry community.
TBF a sociologist might, but furscience are likely sociologists anyway so.
They have verifiable sources and are an international group of interdisciplinary scientists but their conclusions don’t mean that your subjective experiences aren’t real. Still, they are anecdotal, which is why I wanted to provide another source of information for people reading this thread.
Fair enough. You’re right on that front.