renzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 11 个月前AI's take on XMLlemmy.worldimagemessage-square129fedilinkarrow-up11.23Karrow-down122
arrow-up11.21Karrow-down1imageAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldrenzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 11 个月前message-square129fedilink
minus-squareSerinus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down2·11 个月前Disagree. I prefer XML for config files where the efficiency of disk size doesn’t matter at all. Layers of XML are much easier to read than layers of Json. Json is generally better where efficiency matters.
minus-squareMatriks404@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·11 个月前Aren’t most XML parsers faster than JSON parsers anyway?
Disagree. I prefer XML for config files where the efficiency of disk size doesn’t matter at all. Layers of XML are much easier to read than layers of Json. Json is generally better where efficiency matters.
TOML or bust
yes.
Aren’t most XML parsers faster than JSON parsers anyway?