I am a firm believer that there are many privacy techniques you should focus on before encrypted messaging because they will offer you much more “bang for your buck,” things like good passwords, two-factor authentication, and even encrypted email. That said, I still believe that encrypted messaging is a critical part of a well-rounded privacy and security strategy. While the vast majority of our day-to-day conversations may be benign, it can still offer a lot of insight into who we are as people – our routines, likes, and personal thoughts. This information – mundane or not – is worth protecting.

  • ryannathans@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Signal ux is much better fyi, though I accept it’s hard to roll your own. Trade offs are generally worth

    • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      As far as I know you can’t host your own signal server which connects to their servers.

      I’m using Signal with the rest of the family and most friends.

      • JustMarkov@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        As far as I know you can’t host your own signal server which connects to their servers.

        That’s right, Signal is not federated.

      • ryannathans@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah they killed federation, though I can’t disagree with the reason. Thankfully you don’t need to trust the server

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        You can technically set it up base on the published code, but you’d need to modify the client as well. Not like it’s Matrix or XMPP, asking you for server address upon registration. I am afraid to think how much of the server dependence is hardcoded there…