Curious what people think.

Do you think using the GrapheneOS operative system is useless if the user plans to/needs to install Play Store apps anyway?

I think I’m not alone in feeling this way, but sometimes I feel a sense of imposter syndrome because I’m not perfectly private and am dependent on some Play Store apps. This has caused me to question if the transition to GOS is meaningful at all.

Feel free to share your opinion. Cheers! …posted from my GrapheneOS Pixel.

  • oranki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    IMO, just the options to automatically turn off WiFi and Bluetooth after being disconnected for a while are enough to make it worth it. Not to mention all the other privacy benefits, like others have stated.

    Oh, and network permission toggle is also really useful. If only passkey APIs were part of AOSP instead of Play Services / GSF, I’ve got them installed just for that (with only sensors permission)

      • oranki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not a stupid question at all.

        Location is for, well, location specifically. Sensors is a GOS thing, it blocks access to all sensors, like gyro, proximity, ambient light, etc.

        Since it’s not part of AOSP, apps will very likely misbehave if you turn the sensors permission off. That’s why I left it enabled for Play Svcs and GSF, not sure if it’s actually necessary.

        From https://grapheneos.org/usage#bugs-uncovered-by-security-features :

        Similarly, some of the other privacy and security improvements reduce the access available to applications and they may crash. Some of these features are always enabled under the hood, while others like the Network and Sensors toggles are controlled by users via opt-in or opt-out toggles. Apps may not handle having access taken away like this, although it generally doesn’t cause any issues as it’s all designed to be friendly to apps and fully compatible rather than killing the application when it violates the rules.

        • Wild Bill@midwest.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Thanks for the answer. My sensor permission is on for all apps, naturally, but I wasn’t sure if this was safe or privacy-invasive, so your comment definitely helped clear things up! Do you think it’s a good idea to leave the permission on for all apps?

          • oranki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            I don’t think most apps even access sensors. I also think disabling it is not necessary, more so if you don’t allow network for an app. Though some (google) apps may still send data to Google via Play Services, supposedly.

            I wouldn’t worry about it, but you need to decide for yourself. Usablilty is also an important factor, pixels aren’t cheap at least where I live.