Open source printer with refillable ink, no bullshit, accept rolls of papers.

Finally an open source printer ! I dealt with so much stupidity with printers. it warm my heart.

I do have too much joy to practice mandatory critical thinking about the release of a new project. Lets talk about it? i am not the only one to be happy about it, i have no info about the price though :/

  • csolisr@hub.azkware.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    15 hours ago

    While I understand why are they unwilling to allow commercial usage of the final product, it also makes it difficult to actually put in the hands of people. I agree, hopefully they can reconsider for a later iteration.

    • warmaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      If it’s not really FOSS, It’s just an attention grabbing, open washing failure in progress, sponsored by people who don’t understand the licensing implications.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        i do enjoy the fact they’re repurposing hp cartridges. but if this printer thing actually grabs some traction, i can totally see hp EOLing every printer that uses them and ending new production of those cartridges.

        • Starkon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Maybe by then openprinter would have migrated to their ink standard and started producing it. Old models’ ink cartridges can still be refilled but not changed.

      • BeatL@pawb.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I do understand your passion and i respect your disappointment.

        While i understand the explicit implications of cc-by-nc-sa, (attribution, non-commercial,share alike) i fail to understand the implicits implications. Could i trouble you to explain it ?

        • doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I think the criticism is that it’s less likely to build an ecosystem like a Gnu Public License would (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RepRap for an example of a 3d printer that very successfully used the GPL). The CC license prevents large corporations from stealing the design. But it also prevents someone from 3D-printing parts and selling them on a small ebay store.

          Seeing the dissembled printer makes me want it regardless of license tbh

          • confuser@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Finally a real answer haha, had to scroll awhile.

            So the licensing thing is just mostly people complaining that it isnt the most truiest of openness since people tens to conflate floss with accessibility when people call it open and wman accessibility.

            Still getting a reliable printer that I can fix that I’m not vendor locked by that does all the things I could want a printer to do, since this was their goal I’m glad its happening.