I ABHOR how normalised AI has become on platforms around the World Wide Web

It’s lazy and a ultimatumon effort and autodidatic capacity.

You are actively resorting to waste hydropower energy and drag us into potential water shortage pandemonium just to lobotomized what could’ve been a perfectly good joke.

This is one of the online exertions that treasonous vermin Trump wants you to enact to entail his horrible totalitarian deforestation and greenhouse gas emissions .

Stop appeasing to that oligarch genocide funding clown and his immoral calavry of fascist oppressors who operates utilities that are primarily made to pollute our ecosystem and increase climate change and ocean levels raising.

If I ever see another shitty No-effort AI Picture like this again, I will actively and violently scratch out my eyes with a rusty garden weasel wrapped in mint condition barbed wire and sandpaper the wounded sockets shut so I could never see slop take control of meme subculture.

Is it that sophisticated to edit Trump’s head over a keyboardist’s anatomy?

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Views on AI have nothing to do with left or right. It’s actually split right down the middle on both sides.

    • yuki_gassen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yes and no. AI (the ideal) is labor replacement, similar to the first industrial machines. But instead of manual labor, it is replacing cognitive labor. Under capitalism, when profit is always the end game, labor saving tech will not be used to liberate, but to further exploit the people and rape our planet. This is no different, I think. Usually this kind of capital is held mostly in the hands of one class of people, but this tech is unique in that it has the ability to, once trained, be copied and iterated on by others. Open source, or eventually hacked. Software yearns to be free, in the sense that it can be copied easily. Point is, control over the development and distribution of AI is so difficult that even the “common sense” right* end up feeling betrayed. It mainly benefits the far right and the oligarchic class.

      For now, it is not the ideal. But the intentions of the most powerful people seem to continue to race towards unregulated, privately controlled AI. They talk of slowing down, but I don’t have my hopes up after everything that’s happened.

    • Kushan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      But the left wouldn’t be the left if we weren’t fucking fighting each other all the time instead of the right.

      • kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        liberals and socialists fighting eachother isn’t leftists fighting eachother, as liberalism isn’t left wing

        that’s what the case is almost all the time when people call something “leftist infighting”

          • kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            yeah but anarchists aren’t relevant, and real anarchists recognize that marxism is preferable to capitalism

            i’d argue that “anarchists” who prefer capitalism to what is in their opinion the wrong type of socialism and spend all their time fighting against “evil tankies” online instead of fighting capitalism, are just edgy liberals larping because they like the radical aesthetic of anarchism

            • The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              Lmao in one sentence you perfectly exposed why anarchists hate MLs. Aside from all the historical bs, anarchists are just expected to go along with ML because it’s “better than capitalism”, but you’ll never see any ML giving any ground to anarchists.

              Ironically that makes you quite similar to liberals, who always want the left to support them but never give any ground :)

              Personally, I can fight more than one thing at a time. But since you don’t think that’s possible, why are you more focused on fighting anarchists in your comment than capitalism? Is this projection? Are you a liberal? 🤔