People are not allowed to disagree or not like? What’s the downvote button even for then?

I also read a post about downvoted content being “buried”, so I guess most people have their feed by Hot and that’s why? And what would be wrong with that anyway?

New gang till death, I like my content chronologically.

ps: What was that site you could see your upvotes/downvotes? I’m curious about my ratio and how grumpy I have become.

  • naught101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    I still think SlashDot’s voting system was the best I’ve ever seen, where you could attach a reason to your upvote/down vote, and then sort by e.g. most funny, or most insightful…

    • BurgerBaron@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’d combine Slashdot’s voting system with the original iteration of the long defunct Facepunch Forums Smartness system. It was rather mean but I loved how it boosted overall communication quality because it forced users to spellcheck and avoid using slurs.

      Facepunch also had emoticon reactions like Pylova/Piefed although our system is pretty shit with WAY too many emoticons, so much so that they’ll fail to all fully load in.

      Basically a new account started with 5000 points. Different spelling or grammar mistakes along with slurs lost you differing amounts of points. You gained points with error free posts/replies, but it was balanced in such a way that you’d lose points and get auto banned when you hit 0 pretty quickly if you didn’t try to improve. Uncorrected errors would be underlined, colored red, and visible to everyone else. IIRC you could edit posts and correct them but you didn’t regain lost points by doing so, just avoided having shameful red errors.

    • TheFogan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think slashdots also most useful for if I recall, basically no ability to vote.

      IE If I remember right, as a lurker you get no votes. You basically have to participate, and if you get votes on a post, you then get a handful of votes you can use on others. I do wonder how a system like that would work on other sites. If a modernized form of it could work on a reddit like site etc… Would on the surface appear to be a way to counteract bots, but also run the risk of say one bot getting votes and automating a circle jerk with it’s clones.

      • Hal@piefed.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Or simply having bots copy top posts from a year earlier to get upvotes, like they did on Reddit.

    • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yep, when I was on there, I’d give +1 to funny and +2 to trolls. If someone showed up due to their high trolling votes, it was either the wildest or most hateful shit, but it was a hell of a read. Some of it was damned funny.