• lemmelemmy@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    32 minutes ago

    “A German city”

    Fuck is wrong these people? Why can’t anyone title their articles like a normal human being…

  • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    31 minutes ago

    blind people are actually decently assisted by smart glasses. it’s just a shame they’re mostly used by perverts. there should be a state-sanctioned version only for blind people, with limited features, and an open weights AI model hosted somewhere in the same country with data not used for training and such.

    • Vittelius@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      45 minutes ago

      It is basically already illegal everywhere in Germany. German law has these things called “the right to your own image” and “the right to your own voice”. Basically if I want to film or photograph you, I have to ask for permission first, even and especially if you’re out in public. There are exceptions for if the person is incidental to the image (I photograph a building and you just happen to walk into the shot) but these don’t really apply when riding the bus. So using the glasses is already illegal. This is about wearing them.

      Side note, this is also why Germany doesn’t have as many private security cameras. Because you need to place them in such a way that you don’t film the sidewalk, which is complicated. And it’s also why German media doesn’t use secret phone recordings. It’s always a “recollection from memory” re-enacted by a voice actor.

        • Vittelius@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 minutes ago

          And their installation is almost always illegal. But they stay up as long as nobody complains. “Normal” security cameras tend to be big and you can see where they point at. Doorbell cameras are small and easy to miss, so they fly under the radar

  • Unknown_Crawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I had a debate about this the other day. I very much think these are creepy and look bad, but this kind of surveillance tech has existed for a long time, not to mention the prevalence of cellphones. I don’t understand what banning smart glasses accomplishes. There is plenty of creeper tech recording stuff out there. Just seems like poorly thought out legislation. What if I wear my cellphone on a lanyard, would that be illegal? Isn’t there surveillance tech on public transport already? What expectations of privacy do people have?

    I think that any laws being made should focus on the broader concepts such as surveillance, privacy, consent, etc. This just seems like policy driven by people’s dislike of meta creeper glasses.

    • Glitterkoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Other camera tech existsing is not a valid argument that these should. These devices and such technology should be fought and opposed at every corner. Rather have the privacy/surveillance debate kickstarted with a ban on one than risk having them ‘normalized within society’ such that a ban would be unenforceable.

    • ZeDoTelhado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 hours ago

      From my perspective has to do with form factor more than anything else. These smart glasses at a glance are indistinguishable from regular glasses. A phone looks like a phone, so people know what’s up at a glance.

        • DivineDev@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Here’s how I understand the current legal situation in Germany (no guarantees this is correct) :

          Spy cameras (that is, cameras that are concealed or not immediately apparent as such in some way) are illegal to use in public spaces. Smart glasses don’t fall under this category when they have a small indicator LED so that people can tell it’s recording.

    • bandanawearingbanana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The thing is: I would get them too if I could afford it.

      For the headphone stuff which is quite cool tech actually, I don’t like wearing in ear headphones and they basically work as headphones without going into your ears. The Ai stuff seems honestly creepy but I’m sure they legally can’t force you to use it in Europe and the camera stuff seems okay.

      • Evotech@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        You can just buy the headphone part. Shockz open ear headphones . Or many other brands

        I use shokz openrun pro 2 every day. Love them #notad

      • 73ms@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yeah I do think there’s real utility to these and they’ll become more and more useful. These companies are working towards AR glasses that could completely replace phones.