• bedwyr@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Gates might not be the best spokesman for this. It’s great he’s doing something other than raping children with epstein, but fuck this guy.

    • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Probably raping children with someone else now, this behaviour wouldn’t have stopped with Epstein.

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    “AI for the first time can replace or exceed human cognition.” 🤣

    No.

    Maybe if you chose one tiny sliver of human cognition like memory and isolate it, but cognition overall? No chance. LLM tech is a database inference machine. Some uses? Yes. 1/3 of the worlds stock market wealth invested in it? Dumb.

    Not many years ago, Bill Gates said that climate change was the most important issue facing the world.

    I guess that’s solved now, because he now says how we handle AI use and access has taken the mantle as the most important issue the world’s facing.

    This is just more AI cooker stuff from a billionaire octagonarian.

    • eleijeep@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Maybe if you chose one tiny sliver of human cognition like memory and isolate it

      But if we’re playing that game then computers exceeded human cognition 80 years ago when ENIAC replaced human computers at doing arithmetic. If you count mechanical computers then it’s 1000 years ago when mechanical tools were used to perform astronomy calculations.

      Generative AI hasn’t produced anything that exceeds human capability in any field. It’s probably impossible for it to exceed human capability, since it’s a statistical model of human output.

      • voluble@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Generative AI hasn’t produced anything that exceeds human capability in any field

        Chess is an early and canonical example of ai doing exactly that. The speed at which it can complete human-like tasks far exceeds human capability. It’s hard to talk about the enormous problems with ai if we accept it as an undifferentiated point in the march of technological progress.

    • Leon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is just more AI cooker stuff from a billionaire octagonarian.

      Who is so disconnected from reality he doesn’t know the cost of groceries.

      • ragas@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh he knows them. To him it is basically zero.

        His net worth is 100.000.000.000$. The median persons net worth peaks at about 400.000$.

        So in comparison what buying Groceries for the average person is when spending 100$; for him is equivalent to the average persons buying groceries spending 0,04¢.

        He would have to go shopping 25 times to spend the equivalent of a cent.

    • voluble@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I think (comically) Gates uses the word “cognition” to mean, the business output of an individual white collar worker. In that realm, today, ais are faster, more durable, more scalable, more easily put into parallel than humans, they work around the clock and they’re cheaper.

      I don’t like ai. Still, I think Gates is absolutely right that ai is going to swing a wrecking ball into white collar work and there’s no government or industry plan to deal with the human impacts of that.

      • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I hear you, but i disagree - at least based on what we know presently. If you look at US unemployment stats (which are a bit fucked from Covid), they jump in 2023 a little, but have since been decreasing each year since (employment is increasing). You can argue it’s because the Trump admin is cooking the books in hwo they report unemployment, but an almost identical trend is seen in the UK stats… Canada… Germany… Italy (barely even an AI blip in their stats)…

        Are they all cooking the books?

        If you believe the AI hype crew, AI is “improving in leaps and bounds weekly”, but that simply doesn’t align with reality.

        Yeah, LLM AIs (the predominant AI tech in the AI© industry) have increased in quality as the sum total of all earth’s investor-class capital is poured into them… But that isn’t being translated in significant real world applications and job losses.

        Companies tried (and are trying) AI©, and have mostly found it just isn’t any better or more reliable than a human in the vast majority of real world applications.

        If you are a white collar worker and you only make a few minor mistakes now and then - boss doesn’t care, you’re human. On the other hand if you’re a white collar worker and you make only a couple mistakes now and then but wow they are batshit crazy ones that defy your coworkers attempts to understand them - you’re fired. That’s AI.

        • voluble@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think there’s a reasonable, rational position somewhere between the ai hype cringelords on the one hand, and the egotistical humanists on the other who refuse to believe that ai could ever match human output. I think it’s hard to look at what has happened over the past 5 years and have any confidence that ai will be constrained to some trivial, manageable ceiling.

          I understand the skepticism people have around claims of the transformative power of ai. Some of those claims are just companies trumpeting their own products, and these breathless tech articles about how this or that tool is going to change everything, it’s tiring. But I think that can numb us to the signs that something transformative and irrevocable is actually happening.

          Even if we assume that current ai is at its limit of progress (it isn’t), if an agent costs $10k/year and works 24 hours per day, there is a far greater tolerance for mistakes than a worker who costs $50k and wants vacations and benefits, and sleep. Gates makes this point, and I think it’s strong.

          Layoffs due to ai replacing human work are happening in the tech sector already, which I think is arguably a canary in the coal mine situation.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Gates is an irresponsible narcissistic asshole bit he’s right here. Not that its hard yo be right here, its a very obvious observation

  • Eternal192@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    He’s worried because a lot of money is at stake not because he’s worried about our health and safety.

  • Kaligalis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is he also trying to market a model “too dangerous for the public” because it’s just too damn good at finding bugs - like Anthropic?

  • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Shut up pedo, tell us when you plan to fuck yourself or something worthwhile.

    • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Him being evil doesn’t preclude him being right (in this case). By all means, shoot the messenger, but listen to the message.

    • myrmidex@belgae.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Society accuses Bill Gates of knowingly downplaying kiddy-fiddling because too much jail time is at stake.

      Would have made more sense.

      • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Every news article about bill gates should be prefaced by Jeffrey Epstein associate Billiam Gates