• Malyca@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Is here a legal definition or is it still a blanket term for “guns that scare me”?

        • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          There’s a definition in the military but the laws typically call them machine guns or simply ban full auto/burst fire

        • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Why would anyone consider the AR-15 an assault rifle? It’s not any functionally different than your grandad’s hunting rifle. It doesn’t do full auto or burst.

          • iceberg314@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s classified as an “assault rifle” in my state. But yeah, I suppose it varies from state to state.

            • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              I promise you it’s not classified as an assault rifle. It’s probably classified as an assault weapon. That’s a made up term meant to cause this sort of confusion, usually defined by non functional aesthetic features like a foregrip or a heat shroud over the barrel. Its essentially a “scary looking gun” ban. The AR gets lumped in because it’s one of the most common rifles in the country. It’s like trying to end car crashes by banning the Honda Civic.