• LemmyPlaceDN@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think the next tier would be to only pirate media that is licensed by huge corporations and still buy indie media to support creators

    • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Next tier after that: pretty much where I am at. No need to pirate corporate media, I just don’t consume it anymore.

      Yes to local and indie projects though.

      Just for sake of saying it, I really don’t like the term creator.

        • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Whatever they are. Historians, comedians, filmmakers, etc.

          Content is the dumbest word, and again that word means they are making slop to consume so YouTube can shovel you ads.

          • LemmyPlaceDN@europe.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            22 hours ago

            I generally agree, but those terms you prefer are specific about the type of media. I think “creator” and “content” are still the most neutral and catch-all terms, but they have been tarnished by commercialized platforms.

            • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              14 hours ago

              I am lifting this quote from another Lemmy user: “CEO that calls music ~“content without production costs”

              They are referring to the Spotify CEO, and the discussion is about AI making music.

              The relevance here is exactly what I am trying to say: the term “content” is used by the corporations (youtube, Sportify, TikTok) as a catch all term for just about anything to get clicks and revenue. People shouldn’t be reduced to this. We have authors. The books have “content” hence the name Table of Contents. But we dont call an Author a content creator.

              Youtube didn’t give a shit what was on the screen as long as it was “content”. Sell more ads.

              Its a derogatory term I guess is what I am saying.

              • LemmyPlaceDN@europe.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                13 hours ago

                I get your point, but what would be an alternative term for content or creators in general? One that encompasses all types of media. Maybe “artists” and “art”, but that doesn’t always fit, I guess

                • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 hours ago

                  There is no need to encompass all of it. That’s the point.

                  Doesnt the words just stand out as wrong? Creators. Well that means nothing. We all create things.