The products covered by the obligation to repair currently include:

  • washing machines and washer-dryers
  • dishwashers
  • refrigerators
  • electronic displays
  • welding equipment
  • servers and data storage products
  • mobile phones, cordless phones and tablets
  • tumble dryers
  • e-bikes and e-scooters batteries (from 18 February 2027)
  • local space heaters
  • rynn@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I like this for a lot of obvious reasons.

    I worry about corporate malicious compliance though where the cost of a replacement part costs as much as the unit or near it to make up for lost revenue from selling whole units.

    They could even get to the printer ink model where they sell the initial device for cheap or at a lost with planned obsolescence of parts that almost guarantee a replacement rate.

    • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      With this though I think there is legal stance because prohibitively high prices can be used as grounds to say that a product “can’t be repaired”. The legal precedent is there, you can’t just say “technically we give you the option, it’s just $2m”.

      • rynn@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        I really hope you’re right about this. I’ve lost a lot of trust in legal arguments the last few years.