• buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Because it’s a question about the constitutionality of whether or not they were within their rights to violate his.

    This is a question for judges.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Still not an option because jurors are not supposed to know about jury nullification and lawyers are not allowed in any way shape or form to suggest it.

        There is in fact a current case in the UK, which is the legal system that the US has based itself on, in regards to a lawyer insinuating jury nullification during their closing remarks. The lawyer is being held in contempt and is now awaiting their own trial for that.

        • Sirdubdee@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          That’s why it’s important to mention it as much as possible outside of court so potential jurors know it is an option and that they can ignore instructions for the better of the country. It’s why I mentioned it. I’m not a lawyer but I’m not going to say someone is guilty of a crime if the law is being abused. I’d rather let 10 guilty go free than 1 innocent suffer.

          • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I don’t think you understand how much it is that jurors are not allowed to know about jury nullification. If it’s found out that they bring it up in the jury deliberations, or mention or even allude to it during the trial, they can be kicked off the jury immediately.